Impact of heart failure medications on cognitive function: A systematic review.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Soodeh Jahangiri, Eliot Kazakov, Saipranusha Amancherla, Andreas P Kalogeropoulos
{"title":"Impact of heart failure medications on cognitive function: A systematic review.","authors":"Soodeh Jahangiri, Eliot Kazakov, Saipranusha Amancherla, Andreas P Kalogeropoulos","doi":"10.1111/eci.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) often coexists with cognitive impairment and accelerates cognitive decline. However, the impact of HF medications on cognition has received limited attention. This review evaluates the evidence on the cognitive effects of currently recommended medication classes for HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review using PubMed and EMBASE following PRISMA guidelines, employing keywords related to HF, cognitive function and guideline-recommended HF medications. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT) or cohort studies assessing cognitive function in adult HF patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three cohort studies on ACEi/ARBs (N = 5080; 2 prospective, 1 retrospective) reported no significant impact on cognitive function to higher cognitive scores with ACEi/ARBs. Eight studies on sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI, N = 42,143; all observational studies or post-hoc analyses of RCT) found either no effect on cognitive function or reduced risk of new-onset dementia and improved cognitive outcomes with ARNI. Beta-blockers (N = 40; 1 RCT) lacked significant cognitive effects; empagliflozin (SGLT2i, N = 162; 1 prospective) improved cognitive performance in patients with diabetes and HF with preserved ejection fraction; digoxin (N = 1172; 1 retrospective) was associated with enhanced cognitive function; and statins (N = 112,357; 2 retrospective), which are indicated in HF of ischemic aetiology, were not associated with a significant effect on cognition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Guideline-recommended HF medication classes appear to have neutral effects on cognitive function, and some may even offer cognitive benefits. However, the limited number and mostly observational nature of studies prevent firm conclusions. Further research is necessary to better understand the cognitive impact of HF medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"e70008"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) often coexists with cognitive impairment and accelerates cognitive decline. However, the impact of HF medications on cognition has received limited attention. This review evaluates the evidence on the cognitive effects of currently recommended medication classes for HF.

Methods: Systematic review using PubMed and EMBASE following PRISMA guidelines, employing keywords related to HF, cognitive function and guideline-recommended HF medications. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT) or cohort studies assessing cognitive function in adult HF patients.

Results: Three cohort studies on ACEi/ARBs (N = 5080; 2 prospective, 1 retrospective) reported no significant impact on cognitive function to higher cognitive scores with ACEi/ARBs. Eight studies on sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI, N = 42,143; all observational studies or post-hoc analyses of RCT) found either no effect on cognitive function or reduced risk of new-onset dementia and improved cognitive outcomes with ARNI. Beta-blockers (N = 40; 1 RCT) lacked significant cognitive effects; empagliflozin (SGLT2i, N = 162; 1 prospective) improved cognitive performance in patients with diabetes and HF with preserved ejection fraction; digoxin (N = 1172; 1 retrospective) was associated with enhanced cognitive function; and statins (N = 112,357; 2 retrospective), which are indicated in HF of ischemic aetiology, were not associated with a significant effect on cognition.

Conclusions: Guideline-recommended HF medication classes appear to have neutral effects on cognitive function, and some may even offer cognitive benefits. However, the limited number and mostly observational nature of studies prevent firm conclusions. Further research is necessary to better understand the cognitive impact of HF medications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信