Relationships Among Caregiver Burden, Psychological Flexibility Processes, and Anxiety in Family Caregivers of People with Dementia.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Areum Han, Ho Kyung Lee, Ickpyo Hong
{"title":"Relationships Among Caregiver Burden, Psychological Flexibility Processes, and Anxiety in Family Caregivers of People with Dementia.","authors":"Areum Han, Ho Kyung Lee, Ickpyo Hong","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2025.2464868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This cross-sectional study examined the relationships among caregiver burden, anxiety, and key psychological flexibility processes - cognitive fusion, experiential avoidance, and values-driven actions - in family caregivers of individuals with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 191 caregivers in the United States. Structural equation modeling was used to assess direct and indirect relationships among caregiver burden, anxiety, and key psychological flexibility processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model showed excellent fit. Caregiver burden had a significant direct effect on anxiety (59.1% of the total effect), while indirect effects accounted for 40.9%. Cognitive fusion was the only significant mediator between caregiver burden and anxiety, accounting for 20.8% of the total effect. Additionally, experiential avoidance - both alone and when preceded by cognitive fusion - significantly mediated the relationship between caregiver burden and reduced engagement in values-driven actions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight cognitive fusion as a key mechanism linking caregiver burden to anxiety. Furthermore, both cognitive fusion followed by experiential avoidance and experiential avoidance alone appear to influence the relationship between caregiver burden and values-driven actions.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Clinicians may consider implementing skills training targeting cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance to mitigate the negative impact of caregiver burden on anxiety and values-driven actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2025.2464868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This cross-sectional study examined the relationships among caregiver burden, anxiety, and key psychological flexibility processes - cognitive fusion, experiential avoidance, and values-driven actions - in family caregivers of individuals with dementia.

Methods: Data were collected from 191 caregivers in the United States. Structural equation modeling was used to assess direct and indirect relationships among caregiver burden, anxiety, and key psychological flexibility processes.

Results: The model showed excellent fit. Caregiver burden had a significant direct effect on anxiety (59.1% of the total effect), while indirect effects accounted for 40.9%. Cognitive fusion was the only significant mediator between caregiver burden and anxiety, accounting for 20.8% of the total effect. Additionally, experiential avoidance - both alone and when preceded by cognitive fusion - significantly mediated the relationship between caregiver burden and reduced engagement in values-driven actions.

Conclusions: These findings highlight cognitive fusion as a key mechanism linking caregiver burden to anxiety. Furthermore, both cognitive fusion followed by experiential avoidance and experiential avoidance alone appear to influence the relationship between caregiver burden and values-driven actions.

Clinical implications: Clinicians may consider implementing skills training targeting cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance to mitigate the negative impact of caregiver burden on anxiety and values-driven actions.

痴呆症患者家庭照顾者负担、心理弹性过程和焦虑的关系
目的:本横断面研究探讨了痴呆症患者家庭照顾者负担、焦虑和关键心理灵活性过程(认知融合、经验回避和价值观驱动行为)之间的关系。方法:收集美国191名护理人员的数据。采用结构方程模型评估照顾者负担、焦虑和关键心理弹性过程之间的直接和间接关系。结果:模型拟合良好。照顾者负担对焦虑有显著的直接影响(占总影响的59.1%),而间接影响占40.9%。认知融合是照顾者负担与焦虑之间唯一显著的中介,占总效应的20.8%。此外,经验回避-无论是单独的还是在认知融合之前-显着调解照顾者负担和减少参与价值观驱动的行为之间的关系。结论:这些发现强调认知融合是将照顾者负担与焦虑联系起来的关键机制。此外,认知融合后的经验回避和单独的经验回避似乎都影响照顾者负担与价值观驱动行为之间的关系。临床意义:临床医生可以考虑实施以认知融合和经验回避为目标的技能培训,以减轻照顾者负担对焦虑和价值观驱动行为的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信