Dispositional mindfulness, interoceptive awareness, and panic-agoraphobic spectrum, in a general population sample.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mario Miniati, Alessandra Battani, Laura Palagini, Rebecca Ciacchini, Ciro Conversano, Graziella Orrù, Giulio Perugi, Donatella Marazziti, Angelo Gemignani
{"title":"Dispositional mindfulness, interoceptive awareness, and panic-agoraphobic spectrum, in a general population sample.","authors":"Mario Miniati, Alessandra Battani, Laura Palagini, Rebecca Ciacchini, Ciro Conversano, Graziella Orrù, Giulio Perugi, Donatella Marazziti, Angelo Gemignani","doi":"10.1017/S1092852925000100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate dispositional mindfulness (DM), interoceptive awareness (AI), and the occurrence of panic-agoraphobic spectrum signs and symptoms in a non-clinical population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved a general population sample (<i>n</i> = 141), aged between 18 and 40, evaluated with the Panic-Agoraphobic Spectrum Self-Report Lifetime Version (PAS-SR-LT), the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), and the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). Instruments were administered with an online procedure (Microsoft Forms). The Bioethics Committee of the University of Pisa approved the study (protocol #0105635/2023).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Panic-agoraphobic spectrum was detected in more than 50% of our sample (PAS-SR Total Score ≥ 35). According to the MAIA assessment, subjects who scored above the PAS-SR threshold were more afraid and less able to distract attention from their bodily sensations. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate if MAIA and MAAS dimensions were able to predict the presence of a more severe panic-spectrum symptomatology. The PAS-SR cut-off score <35 versus ≥35 was adopted as the dependent variable. \"Age\" and \"gender\" (categorical), MAAS, and MAIA scores were inserted as covariates. MAAS \"Total Score\" (OR = .955; CI = .924-.988; <i>p</i> = .007), and MAIA \"Not worrying\" (OR = .826; CI = .707-.964; <i>p</i> = .016) predicted for a less relevant panic-agoraphobic spectrum phenomenology, resulting as \"protective\" factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Progression from interoceptive processing to mindful abilities to resilience against panic catastrophizing of bodily sensation is far from being clarified. However, our study provides information on a panic-agoraphobic spectrum phenotype characterized by low levels of mindful attitudes and less interoceptive abilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":10505,"journal":{"name":"CNS Spectrums","volume":" ","pages":"e36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Spectrums","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852925000100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate dispositional mindfulness (DM), interoceptive awareness (AI), and the occurrence of panic-agoraphobic spectrum signs and symptoms in a non-clinical population.

Methods: The study involved a general population sample (n = 141), aged between 18 and 40, evaluated with the Panic-Agoraphobic Spectrum Self-Report Lifetime Version (PAS-SR-LT), the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), and the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). Instruments were administered with an online procedure (Microsoft Forms). The Bioethics Committee of the University of Pisa approved the study (protocol #0105635/2023).

Results: Panic-agoraphobic spectrum was detected in more than 50% of our sample (PAS-SR Total Score ≥ 35). According to the MAIA assessment, subjects who scored above the PAS-SR threshold were more afraid and less able to distract attention from their bodily sensations. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate if MAIA and MAAS dimensions were able to predict the presence of a more severe panic-spectrum symptomatology. The PAS-SR cut-off score <35 versus ≥35 was adopted as the dependent variable. "Age" and "gender" (categorical), MAAS, and MAIA scores were inserted as covariates. MAAS "Total Score" (OR = .955; CI = .924-.988; p = .007), and MAIA "Not worrying" (OR = .826; CI = .707-.964; p = .016) predicted for a less relevant panic-agoraphobic spectrum phenomenology, resulting as "protective" factors.

Conclusions: Progression from interoceptive processing to mindful abilities to resilience against panic catastrophizing of bodily sensation is far from being clarified. However, our study provides information on a panic-agoraphobic spectrum phenotype characterized by low levels of mindful attitudes and less interoceptive abilities.

一般人群样本的性格正念,内感受性意识和恐慌-广场恐惧症谱。
目的:探讨非临床人群的性格正念(DM)、内感受性意识(AI)和惊恐-广场恐怖谱系体征和症状的发生情况。方法:选取年龄在18 ~ 40岁的普通人群样本(n = 141),采用惊恐-广场恐惧症谱自我报告终生版(PAS-SR-LT)、正念注意意识量表(MAAS)和内感受意识多维度评估(MAIA)进行评估。仪器使用在线程序(Microsoft Forms)进行管理。比萨大学生物伦理委员会批准了这项研究(协议号0105635/2023)。结果:超过50%的样本检测到恐慌-广场恐惧症(PAS-SR总分≥35)。根据MAIA评估,得分高于PAS-SR阈值的受试者更害怕,更不容易将注意力从身体感觉上转移开来。进行二元logistic回归分析以评估MAIA和MAAS维度是否能够预测更严重的恐慌谱系症状的存在。PAS-SR截止评分p = .007), MAIA“不令人担忧”(OR = .826;ci = .707-.964;P = 0.016)预测了相关性较低的恐慌-广场恐惧症频谱现象,导致“保护性”因素。结论:从内感受加工到正念能力再到对身体感觉恐慌灾难化的恢复能力的进展尚不清楚。然而,我们的研究提供了恐慌-广场恐惧症谱系表型的信息,其特征是低水平的正念态度和较低的内感受能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CNS Spectrums
CNS Spectrums 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
239
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CNS Spectrums covers all aspects of the clinical neurosciences, neurotherapeutics, and neuropsychopharmacology, particularly those pertinent to the clinician and clinical investigator. The journal features focused, in-depth reviews, perspectives, and original research articles. New therapeutics of all types in psychiatry, mental health, and neurology are emphasized, especially first in man studies, proof of concept studies, and translational basic neuroscience studies. Subject coverage spans the full spectrum of neuropsychiatry, focusing on those crossing traditional boundaries between neurology and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信