Investigating the Visit-to-visit Repeatability of Autonomic Neuropathy Assessment Measures in Healthy Subjects.

IF 1.8 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Annie S Jose, Shival Srivastav, Bharati Mehta
{"title":"Investigating the Visit-to-visit Repeatability of Autonomic Neuropathy Assessment Measures in Healthy Subjects.","authors":"Annie S Jose, Shival Srivastav, Bharati Mehta","doi":"10.1177/09727531241310034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autonomic neuropathy assessment is needed for the diagnosis and prognostication of different clinical disorders. Heart rate variability (HRV) and autonomic reactivity assessment by Ewing's battery of tests form the cornerstones of laboratory assessment of cardiac autonomic neuropathy evaluation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While these tests are routinely used, there are conflicting reports regarding the visit-to-visit repeatability of these tests. Therefore, we assessed autonomic measures derived using aforementioned tests on multiple visits in healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 31 healthy subjects and performed autonomic function evaluation on five visits by assessment of HRV and autonomic reactivity on day 1 forenoon and afternoon, next day, one week later and one month later. Repeatability assessment was evaluated using Intraclass correlation coefficients. Values were defined as moderate, good and excellent based on previously reported criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one subjects completed all five visits (17 males, 14 females; mean age = 29 ± 5.44 years). While time-domain measures demonstrated good to excellent repeatability, frequency-domain measures were only moderately repeatable. Autonomic reactivity indices also displayed good to excellent repeatability with the exception of blood pressure response to orthostatic challenge which was moderately repeatable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend that sole reliance on frequency domain metrics for HRV assessment should be avoided. HRV indices and autonomic reactivity measures may continue to be used for cardiac autonomic neuropathy assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7921,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"09727531241310034"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11803598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531241310034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Autonomic neuropathy assessment is needed for the diagnosis and prognostication of different clinical disorders. Heart rate variability (HRV) and autonomic reactivity assessment by Ewing's battery of tests form the cornerstones of laboratory assessment of cardiac autonomic neuropathy evaluation.

Purpose: While these tests are routinely used, there are conflicting reports regarding the visit-to-visit repeatability of these tests. Therefore, we assessed autonomic measures derived using aforementioned tests on multiple visits in healthy subjects.

Methods: We enrolled 31 healthy subjects and performed autonomic function evaluation on five visits by assessment of HRV and autonomic reactivity on day 1 forenoon and afternoon, next day, one week later and one month later. Repeatability assessment was evaluated using Intraclass correlation coefficients. Values were defined as moderate, good and excellent based on previously reported criteria.

Results: Thirty-one subjects completed all five visits (17 males, 14 females; mean age = 29 ± 5.44 years). While time-domain measures demonstrated good to excellent repeatability, frequency-domain measures were only moderately repeatable. Autonomic reactivity indices also displayed good to excellent repeatability with the exception of blood pressure response to orthostatic challenge which was moderately repeatable.

Conclusion: We recommend that sole reliance on frequency domain metrics for HRV assessment should be avoided. HRV indices and autonomic reactivity measures may continue to be used for cardiac autonomic neuropathy assessment.

健康受试者自主神经病变评估方法的访-访可重复性调查。
背景:自主神经病变评估是诊断和预测不同临床疾病的必要条件。心率变异性(HRV)和自主神经反应性评估由Ewing的一系列测试构成了心脏自主神经病变评估的实验室评估的基石。目的:虽然这些测试是常规使用的,但关于这些测试的每次访问可重复性存在相互矛盾的报告。因此,我们评估了在健康受试者的多次访问中使用上述测试得出的自主测量。方法:选取31名健康受试者,分别于第1天上午、下午、第二天、1周后和1个月后,通过HRV和自主神经反应性评估进行自主功能评估,共5次来访。重复性评价采用类内相关系数进行评价。根据先前报道的标准,价值被定义为中等、良好和优秀。结果:31名受试者完成了全部5次访问(男性17名,女性14名;平均年龄= 29±5.44岁)。时域测量显示出良好到优异的可重复性,而频域测量只有适度的可重复性。自主反应性指标也表现出良好到极好的重复性,除了血压对直立性挑战的反应是中等重复性。结论:我们建议避免单纯依赖频域指标进行HRV评估。HRV指数和自主神经反应性测量可继续用于心脏自主神经病变的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Neurosciences
Annals of Neurosciences NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信