Developing approaches to incorporate donor-lung computed tomography images into machine learning models to predict severe primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation.
Weiwei Ma, Inez Oh, Yixuan Luo, Sayantan Kumar, Aditi Gupta, Albert M Lai, Varun Puri, Daniel Kreisel, Andrew E Gelman, Ruben Nava, Chad A Witt, Derek E Byers, Laura Halverson, Rodrigo Vazquez-Guillamet, Philip R O Payne, Aristeidis Sotiras, Hao Lu, Khalid Niazi, Metin N Gurcan, Ramsey R Hachem, Andrew P Michelson
{"title":"Developing approaches to incorporate donor-lung computed tomography images into machine learning models to predict severe primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation.","authors":"Weiwei Ma, Inez Oh, Yixuan Luo, Sayantan Kumar, Aditi Gupta, Albert M Lai, Varun Puri, Daniel Kreisel, Andrew E Gelman, Ruben Nava, Chad A Witt, Derek E Byers, Laura Halverson, Rodrigo Vazquez-Guillamet, Philip R O Payne, Aristeidis Sotiras, Hao Lu, Khalid Niazi, Metin N Gurcan, Ramsey R Hachem, Andrew P Michelson","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a common complication after lung transplantation associated with poor outcomes. Although risk factors have been identified, the complex interactions between clinical variables affecting PGD risk are not well understood, which can complicate decisions about donor-lung acceptance. Previously, we developed a machine learning model to predict grade 3 PGD using donor and recipient electronic health record data, but it lacked granular information from donor-lung computed tomography (CT) scans, which are routinely assessed during offer review. In this study, we used a gated approach to determine optimal methods for analyzing donor-lung CT scans among patients receiving first-time, bilateral lung transplants at a single center over 10 years. We assessed 4 computer vision approaches and fused the best with electronic health record data at 3 points in the machine learning process. A total of 160 patients had donor-lung CT scans for analysis. The best imaging-only approach employed a 3D ResNet model, yielding median (interquartile range) areas under the receiver operating characteristic and precision-recall curves of 0.63 (0.49-0.72) and 0.48 (0.35-0.6), respectively. Combining imaging with clinical data using late fusion provided the highest performance, with median areas under the receiver operating characteristic and precision-recall curves of 0.74 (0.59-0.85) and 0.61 (0.47-0.72), respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a common complication after lung transplantation associated with poor outcomes. Although risk factors have been identified, the complex interactions between clinical variables affecting PGD risk are not well understood, which can complicate decisions about donor-lung acceptance. Previously, we developed a machine learning model to predict grade 3 PGD using donor and recipient electronic health record data, but it lacked granular information from donor-lung computed tomography (CT) scans, which are routinely assessed during offer review. In this study, we used a gated approach to determine optimal methods for analyzing donor-lung CT scans among patients receiving first-time, bilateral lung transplants at a single center over 10 years. We assessed 4 computer vision approaches and fused the best with electronic health record data at 3 points in the machine learning process. A total of 160 patients had donor-lung CT scans for analysis. The best imaging-only approach employed a 3D ResNet model, yielding median (interquartile range) areas under the receiver operating characteristic and precision-recall curves of 0.63 (0.49-0.72) and 0.48 (0.35-0.6), respectively. Combining imaging with clinical data using late fusion provided the highest performance, with median areas under the receiver operating characteristic and precision-recall curves of 0.74 (0.59-0.85) and 0.61 (0.47-0.72), respectively.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide.
The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.