Dynamic effects of psychiatric vulnerability, loneliness and isolation on distress during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic

Lauren Y. Atlas, Cristan Farmer, Jacob S. Shaw, Alison Gibbons, Emily P. Guinee, Juan Antonio Lossio-Ventura, Elizabeth D. Ballard, Monique Ernst, Shruti Japee, Francisco Pereira, Joyce Y. Chung
{"title":"Dynamic effects of psychiatric vulnerability, loneliness and isolation on distress during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Lauren Y. Atlas, Cristan Farmer, Jacob S. Shaw, Alison Gibbons, Emily P. Guinee, Juan Antonio Lossio-Ventura, Elizabeth D. Ballard, Monique Ernst, Shruti Japee, Francisco Pereira, Joyce Y. Chung","doi":"10.1038/s44220-024-00371-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on mental health is challenging to quantify because pre-existing risk, disease burden and public policy varied across individuals, time and regions. Longitudinal, within-person analyses can determine whether pandemic-related changes in social isolation impacted mental health. We analyzed time-varying associations between psychiatric vulnerability, loneliness, psychological distress and social distancing in a US-based study during the first year of the pandemic. We surveyed 3,655 participants about psychological health and COVID-19-related circumstances every 2 weeks for 6 months. We combined self-reports with regional social distancing estimates and a classifier that predicted probability of psychiatric diagnosis at enrollment. Loneliness and psychiatric vulnerability both impacted psychological distress. Loneliness and distress were also linked to social isolation and stress associated with distancing, and psychiatric vulnerability shaped how regional distancing affected loneliness across time. Public health policies should address loneliness when encouraging social distancing, particularly in those at risk for psychiatric conditions. In this new study, the authors analyzed data from a longitudinal US-based survey during the first year of the pandemic, focusing on social distancing, psychiatric vulnerability and loneliness in adults.","PeriodicalId":74247,"journal":{"name":"Nature mental health","volume":"3 2","pages":"199-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-024-00371-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-024-00371-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on mental health is challenging to quantify because pre-existing risk, disease burden and public policy varied across individuals, time and regions. Longitudinal, within-person analyses can determine whether pandemic-related changes in social isolation impacted mental health. We analyzed time-varying associations between psychiatric vulnerability, loneliness, psychological distress and social distancing in a US-based study during the first year of the pandemic. We surveyed 3,655 participants about psychological health and COVID-19-related circumstances every 2 weeks for 6 months. We combined self-reports with regional social distancing estimates and a classifier that predicted probability of psychiatric diagnosis at enrollment. Loneliness and psychiatric vulnerability both impacted psychological distress. Loneliness and distress were also linked to social isolation and stress associated with distancing, and psychiatric vulnerability shaped how regional distancing affected loneliness across time. Public health policies should address loneliness when encouraging social distancing, particularly in those at risk for psychiatric conditions. In this new study, the authors analyzed data from a longitudinal US-based survey during the first year of the pandemic, focusing on social distancing, psychiatric vulnerability and loneliness in adults.

Abstract Image

在COVID-19大流行的第一年,精神脆弱性、孤独和隔离对痛苦的动态影响
COVID-19大流行对心理健康的影响很难量化,因为预先存在的风险、疾病负担和公共政策因个人、时间和地区而异。纵向的个人内部分析可以确定与社会隔离相关的大流行变化是否会影响心理健康。在大流行的第一年,我们在美国的一项研究中分析了精神脆弱性、孤独感、心理困扰和社会距离之间随时间变化的关联。我们每两周对3655名参与者进行一次关于心理健康和covid -19相关情况的调查,持续6个月。我们将自我报告与区域社会距离估计结合起来,并使用分类器预测入组时精神病诊断的概率。孤独和精神脆弱都会影响心理困扰。孤独和痛苦也与社会隔离和与距离相关的压力有关,精神上的脆弱性决定了区域距离如何随着时间的推移影响孤独。公共卫生政策应在鼓励保持社交距离的同时解决孤独问题,特别是对那些有精神疾病风险的人。在这项新研究中,作者分析了大流行第一年美国纵向调查的数据,重点关注成年人的社交距离、精神脆弱性和孤独感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信