Comparative Analysis of Heat Exchanger Models for Phase Change Material Melting Process: Experimental and Numerical Investigation

IF 2.8 Q2 THERMODYNAMICS
Heat Transfer Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1002/htj.23217
Hussein Hatem Saleh, Munther Abdullah Mussa
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Heat Exchanger Models for Phase Change Material Melting Process: Experimental and Numerical Investigation","authors":"Hussein Hatem Saleh,&nbsp;Munther Abdullah Mussa","doi":"10.1002/htj.23217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Thermal energy storage systems using PCM offer promising solutions for efficient thermal applications. This study aims to provide valuable insights into the PCM melting process and compare the thermal performance of different heat exchanger models. The experimental rig is carefully designed to simulate a shell and tube heat exchanger with five longitudinal copper fins at specific conditions. Three distinct models of the heat exchanger, labeled Models A, B, and C, were examined for their heat transfer efficiency during the melting process. Numerical simulations were conducted for the three models and compared with experimental results. Model A represented the benchmark model. It had uniform fin length, location, and angle. Model B was the modified design aimed at enhancing melting progress. These modifications included a longer lower fin, a shorter side fin compared to the reference, and a lower fin angle to optimize heat transfer performance. Model C incorporates further design modifications, with a longer lower fin, a shorter top fin, and different lower fin location. Numerical simulations and experimental observations revealed significant differences in heat transfer performance among the three models. The average heat transfer rates, measured up to the critical decline point, are crucial parameters for practical applications. A comparison among the three models showed that Model B surpassed the average heat transfer rate up to the critical point of Models A and C by 10% and 4%, respectively, demonstrating its superior practical applicability.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":44939,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer","volume":"54 2","pages":"1232-1251"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/htj.23217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thermal energy storage systems using PCM offer promising solutions for efficient thermal applications. This study aims to provide valuable insights into the PCM melting process and compare the thermal performance of different heat exchanger models. The experimental rig is carefully designed to simulate a shell and tube heat exchanger with five longitudinal copper fins at specific conditions. Three distinct models of the heat exchanger, labeled Models A, B, and C, were examined for their heat transfer efficiency during the melting process. Numerical simulations were conducted for the three models and compared with experimental results. Model A represented the benchmark model. It had uniform fin length, location, and angle. Model B was the modified design aimed at enhancing melting progress. These modifications included a longer lower fin, a shorter side fin compared to the reference, and a lower fin angle to optimize heat transfer performance. Model C incorporates further design modifications, with a longer lower fin, a shorter top fin, and different lower fin location. Numerical simulations and experimental observations revealed significant differences in heat transfer performance among the three models. The average heat transfer rates, measured up to the critical decline point, are crucial parameters for practical applications. A comparison among the three models showed that Model B surpassed the average heat transfer rate up to the critical point of Models A and C by 10% and 4%, respectively, demonstrating its superior practical applicability.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heat Transfer
Heat Transfer THERMODYNAMICS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
19.40%
发文量
342
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信