Prototype Models of Personality Disorders: Prototype Convergence and Association With Pathological Traits

IF 3.2 3区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Clinical psychology & psychotherapy Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1002/cpp.70034

Steven K. Huprich, Callie Jowers, Emily Dowgwillo, Hannah Ethridge, Sharon M. Nelson, John H. Porcerelli

{"title":"Prototype Models of Personality Disorders: Prototype Convergence and Association With Pathological Traits","authors":"Steven K. Huprich, Callie Jowers, Emily Dowgwillo, Hannah Ethridge, Sharon M. Nelson, John H. Porcerelli","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The goal of this study was to evaluate whether personality disorder prototypes derived from three different models have similar pathological trait profiles within the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD). Trainee clinicians (<i>N</i> = 329) rated a patient they were currently treating using the Shedler–Westen Assessment Procedure, the DSM-5 hybrid model prototype match (modified from the original prototype DSM-5 proposal) and the <i>Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual</i> prototype match. Correlations among each PD prototype model with the DSM-5 traits were assessed. Theoretically similar prototypes across the SWAP-II, DSM-5 hybrid model and PDM were correlated with several traits across models, ranging from small-to-large effect sizes. Similar prototypes also appeared to display similar trait profiles with some exceptions. Results suggest that the SWAP-II, DSM-5 and PDM prototype models tend to assess similar constructs overall, even though the methods are theoretically distinct. Implications of these findings for PD diagnosis are discussed.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate whether personality disorder prototypes derived from three different models have similar pathological trait profiles within the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD). Trainee clinicians (N = 329) rated a patient they were currently treating using the Shedler–Westen Assessment Procedure, the DSM-5 hybrid model prototype match (modified from the original prototype DSM-5 proposal) and the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual prototype match. Correlations among each PD prototype model with the DSM-5 traits were assessed. Theoretically similar prototypes across the SWAP-II, DSM-5 hybrid model and PDM were correlated with several traits across models, ranging from small-to-large effect sizes. Similar prototypes also appeared to display similar trait profiles with some exceptions. Results suggest that the SWAP-II, DSM-5 and PDM prototype models tend to assess similar constructs overall, even though the methods are theoretically distinct. Implications of these findings for PD diagnosis are discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

6.30

自引率

5.60%

发文量

106

期刊介绍： Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.