Enhanced Strategies of Electric Vehicle Fast Charging Stations and Reliability Assessment in Distribution Networks With Solar-Based Distributed Generation

Energy Storage Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1002/est2.70127
Abhishek Kumar Singh, Ashwani Kumar
{"title":"Enhanced Strategies of Electric Vehicle Fast Charging Stations and Reliability Assessment in Distribution Networks With Solar-Based Distributed Generation","authors":"Abhishek Kumar Singh,&nbsp;Ashwani Kumar","doi":"10.1002/est2.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Industry insiders who want to lower the greenhouse gas emissions linked to conventional fuel cars consider electric vehicles (EVs) as a practical alternative for mobility. EVs are a potential problem even though their performance is limited by their low battery power, long service charging times, and high resource costs. To improve the EV performance, this manuscript presents the hybrid technique for the optimal position of electric vehicles fast-charging stations (EVFCSs) in the distribution network. The proposed scheme is a joined execution of Wild Horse Optimizer (WHO) and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), which is commonly named the WHO-GBDT technique. The primary goal of the research is to decrease loss of power and voltage deviation. The optimal position for an electric vehicle charging station (EVCS) is determined using the WHO method. GDBT is used to predict the load demand. The proposed WHO-GDDT regulates the placement of EVCS, balancing their integration with distributed generation while enhancing the sustainability and reliability of distribution networks. The proposed WHO-GBDT algorithm is actualized in the MATLAB platform and compared their performance with various existing strategies like the Forensic Investigation Algorithm, Archimedean Optimization Algorithm (FBIAOA), Tunicate Swarm Algorithm (TSA), and Cuttlefish Algorithm (CA). The simulation findings of the proposed scheme are validated under three cases in the IEEE 33 bus system, like load 1, load 2 and load 3. From the result, the proposed method effectively reduced loss of power and voltage variation by 58.24% and 90.47%, respectively.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11765,"journal":{"name":"Energy Storage","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Storage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/est2.70127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Industry insiders who want to lower the greenhouse gas emissions linked to conventional fuel cars consider electric vehicles (EVs) as a practical alternative for mobility. EVs are a potential problem even though their performance is limited by their low battery power, long service charging times, and high resource costs. To improve the EV performance, this manuscript presents the hybrid technique for the optimal position of electric vehicles fast-charging stations (EVFCSs) in the distribution network. The proposed scheme is a joined execution of Wild Horse Optimizer (WHO) and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), which is commonly named the WHO-GBDT technique. The primary goal of the research is to decrease loss of power and voltage deviation. The optimal position for an electric vehicle charging station (EVCS) is determined using the WHO method. GDBT is used to predict the load demand. The proposed WHO-GDDT regulates the placement of EVCS, balancing their integration with distributed generation while enhancing the sustainability and reliability of distribution networks. The proposed WHO-GBDT algorithm is actualized in the MATLAB platform and compared their performance with various existing strategies like the Forensic Investigation Algorithm, Archimedean Optimization Algorithm (FBIAOA), Tunicate Swarm Algorithm (TSA), and Cuttlefish Algorithm (CA). The simulation findings of the proposed scheme are validated under three cases in the IEEE 33 bus system, like load 1, load 2 and load 3. From the result, the proposed method effectively reduced loss of power and voltage variation by 58.24% and 90.47%, respectively.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信