Drift-Diffusion Modeling of Attentional Shifting During Frustration: Associations With State Frustration and Trait Irritability

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Nellia Bellaert, Peter J. Castagna, Christen M. Deveney, Michael J. Crowley, Wan-Ling Tseng
{"title":"Drift-Diffusion Modeling of Attentional Shifting During Frustration: Associations With State Frustration and Trait Irritability","authors":"Nellia Bellaert,&nbsp;Peter J. Castagna,&nbsp;Christen M. Deveney,&nbsp;Michael J. Crowley,&nbsp;Wan-Ling Tseng","doi":"10.1155/da/1618163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Irritability, a prevalent and impairing symptom in many mood and anxiety disorders, is characterized by aberrant responses to frustrative nonreward. Past research investigating irritability have used a cued-attention task with rigged feedback, the affective Posner task (AP), to induce frustrative nonreward. Previous studies have not been successful in linking differences in self-reported irritability to traditional AP metrics (i.e., reaction time and accuracy). Computational modeling, via the estimation of parameters reflecting latent cognitive processes, may provide insight into the cognitive mechanisms of irritability and reveal potential targets for mechanism-based interventions. This study applied the drift-diffusion model (DDM) to the AP to determine if DDM parameters are associated with individual differences in irritability. Young adults (<i>N</i> = 152, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 20.93 ± 1.98) completed the AP and self-reported state frustration and trait irritability. Multiple linear regressions were used to evaluate whether DDM parameters better predict state frustration and trait irritability over traditional AP metrics. Higher state frustration was predicted by lower decision threshold during the frustration block and larger decrease in this parameter between nonfrustration and frustration blocks, over traditional AP metrics. These findings demonstrate the potential of applying the DDM to study frustrative nonreward in healthy adult populations. The utility of DDM awaits validation in populations with clinical levels of irritability.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/1618163","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/1618163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irritability, a prevalent and impairing symptom in many mood and anxiety disorders, is characterized by aberrant responses to frustrative nonreward. Past research investigating irritability have used a cued-attention task with rigged feedback, the affective Posner task (AP), to induce frustrative nonreward. Previous studies have not been successful in linking differences in self-reported irritability to traditional AP metrics (i.e., reaction time and accuracy). Computational modeling, via the estimation of parameters reflecting latent cognitive processes, may provide insight into the cognitive mechanisms of irritability and reveal potential targets for mechanism-based interventions. This study applied the drift-diffusion model (DDM) to the AP to determine if DDM parameters are associated with individual differences in irritability. Young adults (N = 152, Mage = 20.93 ± 1.98) completed the AP and self-reported state frustration and trait irritability. Multiple linear regressions were used to evaluate whether DDM parameters better predict state frustration and trait irritability over traditional AP metrics. Higher state frustration was predicted by lower decision threshold during the frustration block and larger decrease in this parameter between nonfrustration and frustration blocks, over traditional AP metrics. These findings demonstrate the potential of applying the DDM to study frustrative nonreward in healthy adult populations. The utility of DDM awaits validation in populations with clinical levels of irritability.

Abstract Image

沮丧时注意转移的漂移-扩散模型:与状态沮丧和特质易怒的关联
易怒是许多情绪和焦虑障碍中普遍存在的损害症状,其特征是对沮丧的不奖励的异常反应。过去调查易怒的研究使用了一个带有操纵反馈的提示注意力任务,即情感波斯纳任务(AP),来诱导沮丧的无奖励。以前的研究并没有成功地将自我报告的易怒性差异与传统的AP指标(即反应时间和准确性)联系起来。计算建模,通过估计反映潜在认知过程的参数,可以深入了解易怒的认知机制,并揭示基于机制的干预的潜在目标。本研究将漂移-扩散模型(DDM)应用于AP,以确定DDM参数是否与易怒的个体差异有关。年轻成人(N = 152, Mage = 20.93±1.98)完成了AP和自我报告的状态挫折和特质烦躁。多元线性回归用于评估DDM参数是否比传统AP指标更能预测状态挫折和特质烦躁。与传统的AP指标相比,在挫折块期间通过较低的决策阈值预测较高的状态挫折,并且在非挫折块和挫折块之间该参数的下降幅度较大。这些发现证明了将DDM应用于研究健康成人群体中的挫折性无奖励行为的潜力。DDM的效用有待于临床易怒人群的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信