Positive changes in daily life? A meta-analysis of positive psychological ecological momentary interventions

IF 3.8 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Applied psychology. Health and well-being Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1111/aphw.70006

Samuel Tomczyk, Christina Ewert

{"title":"Positive changes in daily life? A meta-analysis of positive psychological ecological momentary interventions","authors":"Samuel Tomczyk, Christina Ewert","doi":"10.1111/aphw.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Positive psychological interventions (PPI) hold promise for boosting well-being and quality of life in diverse populations, but not much is known about their efficacy as ecological momentary interventions (EMIs, e.g. via mobile applications) in daily life. This meta-analysis uses random-effects models to examine the efficacy of PPI-EMIs compared to control groups (active or passive) and exploring study region, age, gender, and risk of bias as moderators. Overall, 16 studies were included (N = 3397, 69.1% female, Mage = 21.87, SD = 13.02). We observed clinically significant effects in favor of the intervention for positive affect at posttest (k = 6; g = 0.29; p = 0.05) and well-being at follow-up (k = 5; g = 0.21; p = 0.13). No significant moderator effects were found. The number of studies was small for each outcome, risk of bias was mixed, and heterogeneity of effects was moderate to high for most outcomes.","PeriodicalId":8127,"journal":{"name":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aphw.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aphw.70006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Positive psychological interventions (PPI) hold promise for boosting well-being and quality of life in diverse populations, but not much is known about their efficacy as ecological momentary interventions (EMIs, e.g. via mobile applications) in daily life. This meta-analysis uses random-effects models to examine the efficacy of PPI-EMIs compared to control groups (active or passive) and exploring study region, age, gender, and risk of bias as moderators. Overall, 16 studies were included (N = 3397, 69.1% female, M_age = 21.87, SD = 13.02). We observed clinically significant effects in favor of the intervention for positive affect at posttest (k = 6; g = 0.29; p = 0.05) and well-being at follow-up (k = 5; g = 0.21; p = 0.13). No significant moderator effects were found. The number of studies was small for each outcome, risk of bias was mixed, and heterogeneity of effects was moderate to high for most outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Applied psychology. Health and well-being PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

12.10

自引率

2.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the International Association of Applied Psychology. It was established in 2009 and covers applied psychology topics such as clinical psychology, counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and environmental psychology.