Analysis of Hydrothermal Flow and Performance of Heat Transfer in 3D Pipes Based on Varying Dimple Structure Configurations

IF 2.8 Q2 THERMODYNAMICS
Heat Transfer Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1002/htj.23244
Saad Raad Al-Haidari, Ahmed Ramadhan Al-Obaidi
{"title":"Analysis of Hydrothermal Flow and Performance of Heat Transfer in 3D Pipes Based on Varying Dimple Structure Configurations","authors":"Saad Raad Al-Haidari,&nbsp;Ahmed Ramadhan Al-Obaidi","doi":"10.1002/htj.23244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the current work, the study examines the flow patterns and heat transfer capabilities of tubes with various spherical dimple configurations. A numerical analysis, supported by experimental validation on a reference model, was conducted on a circular tube with an alternating flow path. The primary goal was to enhance the thermal performance of circular tubes by inducing mixing and vortex flows. The impact of three design factors on thermal–hydraulic performance was investigated, dimple pipe diameter (DPD), dimple group number (DGN), and number of dimples (NODs). Dimpled tubes consistently outperformed smooth tubes in heat transfer due to increased flow mixing and separation. Both increasing the Reynolds number and decreasing the design factors led to the formation of mixing and vortex patterns. The performance evaluation factor (PEF) varied across different dimple configurations. For DPD, PEF ranged from 1.14 to 1.33; for DGN, it ranged from 1.15 to 1.28; for NOD, it ranged from 0.95 to 1.21, all within a Reynolds number range of 4000–15,000. At a Reynolds number of 6000, all three configurations of DPD, DGN, and NOD outperformed the smooth pipe in terms of the Nusselt number. For DPD, Nusselt number improvements ranged from 25.7% to 30.8%, and friction factors increased by 21% to 67%. DGN configurations exhibited a wider range of Nusselt number enhancement from 25% to 49.6%, and friction factor increase from 37% to 72%. NOD configurations also demonstrated consistent improvements, with Nusselt number increases ranging from 27.35% to 31% and friction factor increases from 42% to 74%. Spherical dimples can significantly enhance the thermal–hydraulic performance of tubes, so the best configuration depends on the specific application, and the highest performance, with a 1.33 increase in PEF, was achieved with a dimple diameter of 2 mm (DPD = 2 mm) and a dimple density of four dimples per unit area (NOD = 4).</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":44939,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer","volume":"54 2","pages":"1589-1610"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/htj.23244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the current work, the study examines the flow patterns and heat transfer capabilities of tubes with various spherical dimple configurations. A numerical analysis, supported by experimental validation on a reference model, was conducted on a circular tube with an alternating flow path. The primary goal was to enhance the thermal performance of circular tubes by inducing mixing and vortex flows. The impact of three design factors on thermal–hydraulic performance was investigated, dimple pipe diameter (DPD), dimple group number (DGN), and number of dimples (NODs). Dimpled tubes consistently outperformed smooth tubes in heat transfer due to increased flow mixing and separation. Both increasing the Reynolds number and decreasing the design factors led to the formation of mixing and vortex patterns. The performance evaluation factor (PEF) varied across different dimple configurations. For DPD, PEF ranged from 1.14 to 1.33; for DGN, it ranged from 1.15 to 1.28; for NOD, it ranged from 0.95 to 1.21, all within a Reynolds number range of 4000–15,000. At a Reynolds number of 6000, all three configurations of DPD, DGN, and NOD outperformed the smooth pipe in terms of the Nusselt number. For DPD, Nusselt number improvements ranged from 25.7% to 30.8%, and friction factors increased by 21% to 67%. DGN configurations exhibited a wider range of Nusselt number enhancement from 25% to 49.6%, and friction factor increase from 37% to 72%. NOD configurations also demonstrated consistent improvements, with Nusselt number increases ranging from 27.35% to 31% and friction factor increases from 42% to 74%. Spherical dimples can significantly enhance the thermal–hydraulic performance of tubes, so the best configuration depends on the specific application, and the highest performance, with a 1.33 increase in PEF, was achieved with a dimple diameter of 2 mm (DPD = 2 mm) and a dimple density of four dimples per unit area (NOD = 4).

基于不同凹窝结构构型的三维管道热液流动及传热性能分析
在目前的工作中,研究了具有不同球形凹窝结构的管的流动模式和传热能力。对具有交变流道的圆管进行了数值分析,并在参考模型上进行了实验验证。主要目的是通过诱导混合和涡旋流动来提高圆管的热性能。研究了压窝管径(DPD)、压窝组数(DGN)和压窝数(NODs) 3个设计因素对热工性能的影响。由于增加了流动混合和分离,凹坑管在传热方面始终优于光滑管。增大雷诺数和减小设计因子都会导致混合型和涡型的形成。性能评价因子(PEF)在不同的凹窝配置中有所不同。DPD的PEF范围为1.14 ~ 1.33;DGN取值范围为1.15 ~ 1.28;NOD的雷诺数范围为0.95 ~ 1.21,雷诺数范围均在4000 ~ 15000之间。在6000雷诺数下,DPD、DGN和NOD三种配置的努塞尔数都优于光滑管。对于DPD, Nusselt数的改进范围从25.7%到30.8%,摩擦系数增加了21%到67%。DGN结构的Nusselt数增强范围从25%增加到49.6%,摩擦系数从37%增加到72%。NOD配置也表现出了持续的改进,Nusselt数从27.35%增加到31%,摩擦系数从42%增加到74%。球形凹窝可以显著提高管道的热工性能,因此最佳配置取决于具体应用,当凹窝直径为2 mm (DPD = 2 mm)和凹窝密度为4个/单位面积(NOD = 4)时,可获得最高性能,PEF增加1.33。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heat Transfer
Heat Transfer THERMODYNAMICS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
19.40%
发文量
342
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信