Seismic Response of Ground Penetrating Shield Tunnels Under Lateral Harmonic Excitations: Insights From Shaking Table Test

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Yong Yuan, Qi Wang, Tao Liu, Haitao Yu, Ioannis Anastasopoulos
{"title":"Seismic Response of Ground Penetrating Shield Tunnels Under Lateral Harmonic Excitations: Insights From Shaking Table Test","authors":"Yong Yuan,&nbsp;Qi Wang,&nbsp;Tao Liu,&nbsp;Haitao Yu,&nbsp;Ioannis Anastasopoulos","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ground penetrating shield tunnel (GPST) method offers a streamlined approach to tunnel construction in soft ground with limited open-cut excavation. To explore the seismic response of GPST linings, a series of large-scale shaking table tests have been conducted, including a variety of seismic excitations. This paper focuses on lateral harmonic excitation. The model tunnel spans a total length of 7.7 m, with the embedment depth ranging from −0.5 to 0.5 times its diameter. The design and fabrication of the model tunnel are presented, including the segmental lining, along with circumferential and longitudinal joints. The soil was modeled with artificial synthetic soil, aiming to simulate the static and dynamic characteristics of the prototype soil. Its composition was adjusted and verified through element tests. The experimental results provide insights into the seismic response of the soil–tunnel system, the ovaling deformation of the segmental lining, as well as the response of the joints between lining segments. The results reveal a strong influence of embedment on tunnel seismic response. The reduction of tunnel embedment leads to a significant increase in lining accelerations and a phase difference, resulting in a “whiplash” effect. In contrast, the ovaling deformation of the lining and the joint apertures decrease with the reduction of embedment. In the sections of the tunnel that are fully embedded, both the acceleration and deformation response of the lining are governed by soil–structure interaction (SSI). A pronounced whiplash effect is observed in the sections of the tunnel that are not fully embedded, due to the absence of soil confinement. The presented experimental results offer valuable insights into the seismic response of GPSTs, which can be of crucial importance for their seismic design.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 3","pages":"867-884"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eqe.4284","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ground penetrating shield tunnel (GPST) method offers a streamlined approach to tunnel construction in soft ground with limited open-cut excavation. To explore the seismic response of GPST linings, a series of large-scale shaking table tests have been conducted, including a variety of seismic excitations. This paper focuses on lateral harmonic excitation. The model tunnel spans a total length of 7.7 m, with the embedment depth ranging from −0.5 to 0.5 times its diameter. The design and fabrication of the model tunnel are presented, including the segmental lining, along with circumferential and longitudinal joints. The soil was modeled with artificial synthetic soil, aiming to simulate the static and dynamic characteristics of the prototype soil. Its composition was adjusted and verified through element tests. The experimental results provide insights into the seismic response of the soil–tunnel system, the ovaling deformation of the segmental lining, as well as the response of the joints between lining segments. The results reveal a strong influence of embedment on tunnel seismic response. The reduction of tunnel embedment leads to a significant increase in lining accelerations and a phase difference, resulting in a “whiplash” effect. In contrast, the ovaling deformation of the lining and the joint apertures decrease with the reduction of embedment. In the sections of the tunnel that are fully embedded, both the acceleration and deformation response of the lining are governed by soil–structure interaction (SSI). A pronounced whiplash effect is observed in the sections of the tunnel that are not fully embedded, due to the absence of soil confinement. The presented experimental results offer valuable insights into the seismic response of GPSTs, which can be of crucial importance for their seismic design.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信