{"title":"Regime-dependent health care employment dynamics in recessions","authors":"Luiggi Donayre, Lacey Loomer","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2025.101036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We relax the assumption that recessions are all alike in studying whether U.S. health care employment is recession-proof. Because health care services are inelastic and largely driven by costs, we argue that economic conditions influence health care employment only to the extent that they significantly affect health care wage growth. Using U.S. monthly data for 1990–2022, we estimate a threshold vector autoregression that allows for regime-dependent negative demand and negative supply shocks in examining the response of health care employment growth in recessionary periods. When wage growth is high as determined by an endogenously-estimated threshold, we find a large and significant reduction in health care employment growth during demand-induced recessions and a smaller decline during supply-induced recessions. Meanwhile, health care employment growth does not respond significantly to negative demand or supply shocks in the low-cost regime. Further, a disaggregated analysis evidences large heterogeneity across sub-sectors. In this way, our findings reveal that both the source of the shock and health care wage growth are important in explaining health care employment dynamics. Thus, health care organizations that are more labor cost efficient will be more insulated from economic disruptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46094,"journal":{"name":"Research in Economics","volume":"79 2","pages":"Article 101036"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944325000134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We relax the assumption that recessions are all alike in studying whether U.S. health care employment is recession-proof. Because health care services are inelastic and largely driven by costs, we argue that economic conditions influence health care employment only to the extent that they significantly affect health care wage growth. Using U.S. monthly data for 1990–2022, we estimate a threshold vector autoregression that allows for regime-dependent negative demand and negative supply shocks in examining the response of health care employment growth in recessionary periods. When wage growth is high as determined by an endogenously-estimated threshold, we find a large and significant reduction in health care employment growth during demand-induced recessions and a smaller decline during supply-induced recessions. Meanwhile, health care employment growth does not respond significantly to negative demand or supply shocks in the low-cost regime. Further, a disaggregated analysis evidences large heterogeneity across sub-sectors. In this way, our findings reveal that both the source of the shock and health care wage growth are important in explaining health care employment dynamics. Thus, health care organizations that are more labor cost efficient will be more insulated from economic disruptions.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.