Intelligent decision support framework for assessment of alternative vehicle technologies in transportation system: A sustainable approach toward environmental remedy

IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ibrahim Alrashdi , Ahmed M. Ali , Karam M. Sallam , Mohamed Abdel-Basset
{"title":"Intelligent decision support framework for assessment of alternative vehicle technologies in transportation system: A sustainable approach toward environmental remedy","authors":"Ibrahim Alrashdi ,&nbsp;Ahmed M. Ali ,&nbsp;Karam M. Sallam ,&nbsp;Mohamed Abdel-Basset","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transportation system has the most considerable negative impacts on the environment due to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, so various governments seek to reduce GHG emissions by using the best alternative vehicle technologies in the transportation system. This paper presents a framework for selecting the best alternative vehicle technology in Egypt to reduce the emission of GHG toward sustainability. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is used to deal with various conflicting criteria. This paper uses two MCDM methods: stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) and root assessment method (RAM). This study extends the SWARA and RAM methods under single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNSs). The SVN-SWARA method is used to compute the criteria weights, and the SVN-RAM method is used to rank the alternatives. This study used seven main criteria, 40 sub-criteria, and 12 alternative vehicle technologies. The results in weights of criteria show that social criterion has the highest importance, and the market criterion has the lowest importance. The results in the rank of alternatives show the Electric vehicles (alternative) are the best choice for GHG emission reduction and for achieving sustainability in the transportation system in Egypt. The sensitivity and comparative analysis showed that the rank of alternatives is stable under different scenarios and that the proposed methodology is effective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100472"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188825000425","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transportation system has the most considerable negative impacts on the environment due to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, so various governments seek to reduce GHG emissions by using the best alternative vehicle technologies in the transportation system. This paper presents a framework for selecting the best alternative vehicle technology in Egypt to reduce the emission of GHG toward sustainability. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is used to deal with various conflicting criteria. This paper uses two MCDM methods: stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) and root assessment method (RAM). This study extends the SWARA and RAM methods under single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNSs). The SVN-SWARA method is used to compute the criteria weights, and the SVN-RAM method is used to rank the alternatives. This study used seven main criteria, 40 sub-criteria, and 12 alternative vehicle technologies. The results in weights of criteria show that social criterion has the highest importance, and the market criterion has the lowest importance. The results in the rank of alternatives show the Electric vehicles (alternative) are the best choice for GHG emission reduction and for achieving sustainability in the transportation system in Egypt. The sensitivity and comparative analysis showed that the rank of alternatives is stable under different scenarios and that the proposed methodology is effective.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信