Developing sufficiency-based sharing principles for absolute environmental sustainability assessment using decent living standards and planetary boundaries

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jonas Balsby Kromand , Joachim Peter Tilsted , Anders Bjørn
{"title":"Developing sufficiency-based sharing principles for absolute environmental sustainability assessment using decent living standards and planetary boundaries","authors":"Jonas Balsby Kromand ,&nbsp;Joachim Peter Tilsted ,&nbsp;Anders Bjørn","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Absolute environmental sustainability assessments quantify the environmental impacts of human activities in relation to ecological carrying capacities. Such assessments necessitate the application of sharing principles to allocate shares of carrying capacity to actors and activities at different scales, including products, companies, sectors, and countries. This can help decision-makers set targets and take actions accordingly. Although a range of approaches exist, sharing principles that prioritize human needs fulfillment for all people are not properly developed. To address this gap, we develop sufficiency-based sharing principles. We do so by quantifying the life cycle impacts of satisfying decent living standards for the population of a high-income country in 2050 (Denmark) and comparing these impacts to planetary boundaries to identify a possible ‘sufficiency consumption space’. From this exercise, we infer two sharing principles. The first sharing principle assigns the allowed environmental impacts to all decent living standard consumption categories across 16 life cycle impact categories. The second sharing principle uses the degree of luxury of all goods and services in the economy, operationalized by expenditure elasticities, as a principle to share the sufficiency consumption space at a product-level. Together, these two sharing principles form a coherent suggestion for how to share a country's safe operating space, split between decent living consumption and remaining consumption. Our study thereby represents the first systematic and quantitative attempt at allocating a country's safe operating space according to human needs fulfillment and prioritizing a sufficiency consumption space according to the degree of luxury. Future research can address limitations of our study by, for example, using more granular life cycle inventory data and household expenditure data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"54 ","pages":"Pages 516-529"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925000089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Absolute environmental sustainability assessments quantify the environmental impacts of human activities in relation to ecological carrying capacities. Such assessments necessitate the application of sharing principles to allocate shares of carrying capacity to actors and activities at different scales, including products, companies, sectors, and countries. This can help decision-makers set targets and take actions accordingly. Although a range of approaches exist, sharing principles that prioritize human needs fulfillment for all people are not properly developed. To address this gap, we develop sufficiency-based sharing principles. We do so by quantifying the life cycle impacts of satisfying decent living standards for the population of a high-income country in 2050 (Denmark) and comparing these impacts to planetary boundaries to identify a possible ‘sufficiency consumption space’. From this exercise, we infer two sharing principles. The first sharing principle assigns the allowed environmental impacts to all decent living standard consumption categories across 16 life cycle impact categories. The second sharing principle uses the degree of luxury of all goods and services in the economy, operationalized by expenditure elasticities, as a principle to share the sufficiency consumption space at a product-level. Together, these two sharing principles form a coherent suggestion for how to share a country's safe operating space, split between decent living consumption and remaining consumption. Our study thereby represents the first systematic and quantitative attempt at allocating a country's safe operating space according to human needs fulfillment and prioritizing a sufficiency consumption space according to the degree of luxury. Future research can address limitations of our study by, for example, using more granular life cycle inventory data and household expenditure data.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信