Toward greener transit: Carbon-efficient density thresholds for public transit vs. private vehicles

IF 7.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Bumsoo Lee , Sungwon Lee
{"title":"Toward greener transit: Carbon-efficient density thresholds for public transit vs. private vehicles","authors":"Bumsoo Lee ,&nbsp;Sungwon Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite its potential as a sustainable transportation mode, public transit in many low-density urban and suburban areas in the U.S often generates more CO<sub>2</sub> <!-->emissions per passenger-mile than privately operated vehicles (POVs), primarily due to low ridership and passenger loads. Using Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDT) and spline regression models, this study investigates the non-linear relationship between population density and the relative carbon efficiency of transit compared to POVs across the 136 largest U.S. urban areas. This study found that the minimum density required for public transit to be more carbon-efficient than driving, while controlling for other factors, is around the lowest 10th<!--> <!-->percentile of population-weighted density (PWD)—approximately 3.4 persons per acre. Further, a critical density threshold was identified at around the 80th<!--> <!-->percentile of PWD, about 8.6 persons per acre, beyond which the positive impact of population density on transit’s carbon efficiency significantly shifts up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 104641"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925000513","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite its potential as a sustainable transportation mode, public transit in many low-density urban and suburban areas in the U.S often generates more CO2 emissions per passenger-mile than privately operated vehicles (POVs), primarily due to low ridership and passenger loads. Using Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDT) and spline regression models, this study investigates the non-linear relationship between population density and the relative carbon efficiency of transit compared to POVs across the 136 largest U.S. urban areas. This study found that the minimum density required for public transit to be more carbon-efficient than driving, while controlling for other factors, is around the lowest 10th percentile of population-weighted density (PWD)—approximately 3.4 persons per acre. Further, a critical density threshold was identified at around the 80th percentile of PWD, about 8.6 persons per acre, beyond which the positive impact of population density on transit’s carbon efficiency significantly shifts up.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
314
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution. We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信