Dosimetry of automatic non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Q1 Health Professions
Kaiqiang Chen, Jihong Chen, Yanming Cheng, Danni Hong, Cairong Hu, Penggang Bai, Jinyong Lin, Yang Yang, Xiuchun Zhang
{"title":"Dosimetry of automatic non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma","authors":"Kaiqiang Chen,&nbsp;Jihong Chen,&nbsp;Yanming Cheng,&nbsp;Danni Hong,&nbsp;Cairong Hu,&nbsp;Penggang Bai,&nbsp;Jinyong Lin,&nbsp;Yang Yang,&nbsp;Xiuchun Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the dosimetric quality of radiotherapy plans for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) using HyperArc (HA) technology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 20 patients with initially diagnosed NPC who had received TomoTherapy (TOMO) treatment. Treatment plans were redesigned using HA technology on the Eclipse planning system. Dosimetric parameters and verification passing rates were collected to assess the dosimetric quality of target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing in both sets of plans. Paired <em>t</em>-tests or Rank-Sum tests were used to compare the dosimetric parameters between the two plans.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For the planning target volumes (PTVs), the target coverage in both plans reached 95%. Compared with the TOMO plans, the HA plans exhibited a steeper dose fall-off for PTV<sub>69.75Gy</sub> (<em>P</em> ​&lt; ​0.05). However, the conformity index (CI) of the HA plans (0.75) was slightly lower than that of the TOMO plans (0.81, <em>P</em> ​<em>&lt;</em> ​0.05). The homogeneity index (HI) was better in the TOMO plans, with statistically significant differences for PTV<sub>69.75Gy</sub> and PTV<sub>55.80Gy</sub> (<em>P</em> ​&lt; ​0.05). Moreover, the HA plans had better sparing, particularly for the optic chiasm, optic nerves, and parotid glands (<em>P</em> ​&lt; ​0.05), while no statistically significant differences were observed for other critical structures such as the brainstem, spinal cord, and temporal lobes (<em>P</em> ​&gt; ​0.05). Additionally, the average beam-on time for the HA plans (252 ​s) was shorter than that of the TOMO plans (326 ​s, <em>P</em> ​&lt; ​0.05). The mean gamma passing rate at 3%/2 ​mm for all plans exceeded 98%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Radiotherapy plans for NPC based on HA technology exhibit excellent dosimetric quality, providing good target coverage, rapid dose fall-off, and effective protection of adjacent critical organs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34051,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 37-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555724001217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the dosimetric quality of radiotherapy plans for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) using HyperArc (HA) technology.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 20 patients with initially diagnosed NPC who had received TomoTherapy (TOMO) treatment. Treatment plans were redesigned using HA technology on the Eclipse planning system. Dosimetric parameters and verification passing rates were collected to assess the dosimetric quality of target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing in both sets of plans. Paired t-tests or Rank-Sum tests were used to compare the dosimetric parameters between the two plans.

Results

For the planning target volumes (PTVs), the target coverage in both plans reached 95%. Compared with the TOMO plans, the HA plans exhibited a steeper dose fall-off for PTV69.75Gy (P ​< ​0.05). However, the conformity index (CI) of the HA plans (0.75) was slightly lower than that of the TOMO plans (0.81, P ​< ​0.05). The homogeneity index (HI) was better in the TOMO plans, with statistically significant differences for PTV69.75Gy and PTV55.80Gy (P ​< ​0.05). Moreover, the HA plans had better sparing, particularly for the optic chiasm, optic nerves, and parotid glands (P ​< ​0.05), while no statistically significant differences were observed for other critical structures such as the brainstem, spinal cord, and temporal lobes (P ​> ​0.05). Additionally, the average beam-on time for the HA plans (252 ​s) was shorter than that of the TOMO plans (326 ​s, P ​< ​0.05). The mean gamma passing rate at 3%/2 ​mm for all plans exceeded 98%.

Conclusions

Radiotherapy plans for NPC based on HA technology exhibit excellent dosimetric quality, providing good target coverage, rapid dose fall-off, and effective protection of adjacent critical organs.
自动非共面体积调节弧线治疗鼻咽癌的剂量学研究
目的评价超弧光(HyperArc, HA)技术在鼻咽癌放疗方案中的剂量学质量。方法回顾性分析20例初诊鼻咽癌患者经TOMO治疗的临床资料。在Eclipse计划系统上使用HA技术重新设计治疗方案。收集剂量学参数和验证通过率,以评估两套计划中目标覆盖和风险器官(OAR)保留的剂量学质量。配对t检验或秩和检验用于比较两种方案之间的剂量学参数。结果规划目标区(PTVs)的目标覆盖率均达到95%。与TOMO方案相比,HA方案PTV69.75Gy的剂量衰减更大(P <;0.05)。但HA方案的符合性指数(CI)(0.75)略低于TOMO方案(0.81),P <;0.05)。TOMO方案的同质性指数(HI)较好,PTV69.75Gy与PTV55.80Gy的同质性指数(HI)差异有统计学意义(P <;0.05)。此外,HA方案有更好的保留,特别是视交叉、视神经和腮腺(P <;0.05),而其他关键结构如脑干、脊髓和颞叶的差异无统计学意义(P >;0.05)。此外,HA计划的平均光束启动时间(252秒)比TOMO计划的平均光束启动时间(326秒)短。0.05)。所有方案在3%/ 2mm的平均伽马通过率均超过98%。结论基于HA技术的鼻咽癌放疗方案具有良好的剂量学质量,靶覆盖好,剂量衰减快,能有效保护邻近关键器官。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Radiation Medicine and Protection Health Professions-Emergency Medical Services
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信