Extra-uterine placental transfusion and intact-cord stabilisation of moderately preterm to term infants in caesarean deliveries - A feasibility study with historical control (INTACT-2)

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Elisabeth Sæther , Ola Andersson , Tor Åge Myklebust , Solveig Bjellmo , Stine Bernitz , Solhild Stridsklev , Beate Horsberg Eriksen
{"title":"Extra-uterine placental transfusion and intact-cord stabilisation of moderately preterm to term infants in caesarean deliveries - A feasibility study with historical control (INTACT-2)","authors":"Elisabeth Sæther ,&nbsp;Ola Andersson ,&nbsp;Tor Åge Myklebust ,&nbsp;Solveig Bjellmo ,&nbsp;Stine Bernitz ,&nbsp;Solhild Stridsklev ,&nbsp;Beate Horsberg Eriksen","doi":"10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2025.106208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Background: Although delayed umbilical cord clamping (DCC) is universally recommended, implementation has been difficult in caesarean deliveries. The study objective was to test if extra-uterine placental transfusion (delivering the placenta before cord clamping) to facilitate intact-cord stabilisation could be a feasible and safe alternative to DCC (≥ 1 min) for moderately preterm to term infants with caesarean delivery in regional anaesthesia and their mothers. Methods: This feasibility study included infants with GA 32<sup>0</sup> to 42<sup>3</sup> weeks with planned or emergency caesarean delivery. Primary outcome was intervention compliance. Safety outcomes were prevalence of blood loss ≥1000 ml or postoperative wound infection in mothers, and prevalence of early cord clamping (ECC), low 5-min Apgar scores and hypothermia in infants. Results: We included 123 mother-infant pairs in the intervention group and 158 in the historical control group. The intervention was successfully completed in 121 of 123 cases. There were no statistically significant differences in maternal outcomes. Significantly less infants in the intervention group had ECC before 60 s (OR 0.07, CI (0.01–0.51), <em>P</em> = 0.009) and 5-min Apgar scores &lt;7 (<em>P</em> = 0.003) compared to historical controls. There was no significant difference in infant hypothermia. Conclusion: Extra-uterine placental transfusion may be a reasonable alternative to DCC for term and near term preterm infants with caesarean delivery in regional anaesthesia. The intervention may be especially useful in low-income birth settings with high prevalence of iron deficiency/anaemia and no mobile resuscitation equipment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11435,"journal":{"name":"Early human development","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 106208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early human development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378225000180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although delayed umbilical cord clamping (DCC) is universally recommended, implementation has been difficult in caesarean deliveries. The study objective was to test if extra-uterine placental transfusion (delivering the placenta before cord clamping) to facilitate intact-cord stabilisation could be a feasible and safe alternative to DCC (≥ 1 min) for moderately preterm to term infants with caesarean delivery in regional anaesthesia and their mothers. Methods: This feasibility study included infants with GA 320 to 423 weeks with planned or emergency caesarean delivery. Primary outcome was intervention compliance. Safety outcomes were prevalence of blood loss ≥1000 ml or postoperative wound infection in mothers, and prevalence of early cord clamping (ECC), low 5-min Apgar scores and hypothermia in infants. Results: We included 123 mother-infant pairs in the intervention group and 158 in the historical control group. The intervention was successfully completed in 121 of 123 cases. There were no statistically significant differences in maternal outcomes. Significantly less infants in the intervention group had ECC before 60 s (OR 0.07, CI (0.01–0.51), P = 0.009) and 5-min Apgar scores <7 (P = 0.003) compared to historical controls. There was no significant difference in infant hypothermia. Conclusion: Extra-uterine placental transfusion may be a reasonable alternative to DCC for term and near term preterm infants with caesarean delivery in regional anaesthesia. The intervention may be especially useful in low-income birth settings with high prevalence of iron deficiency/anaemia and no mobile resuscitation equipment.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early human development
Early human development 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Established as an authoritative, highly cited voice on early human development, Early Human Development provides a unique opportunity for researchers and clinicians to bridge the communication gap between disciplines. Creating a forum for the productive exchange of ideas concerning early human growth and development, the journal publishes original research and clinical papers with particular emphasis on the continuum between fetal life and the perinatal period; aspects of postnatal growth influenced by early events; and the safeguarding of the quality of human survival. The first comprehensive and interdisciplinary journal in this area of growing importance, Early Human Development offers pertinent contributions to the following subject areas: Fetology; perinatology; pediatrics; growth and development; obstetrics; reproduction and fertility; epidemiology; behavioural sciences; nutrition and metabolism; teratology; neurology; brain biology; developmental psychology and screening.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信