Geospatial analysis for promoting urban green space equity: Case study of Detroit, Michigan, USA

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jessica LaReaux, David Watkins
{"title":"Geospatial analysis for promoting urban green space equity: Case study of Detroit, Michigan, USA","authors":"Jessica LaReaux,&nbsp;David Watkins","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban green spaces play a vital role in promoting human health and well-being, enhancing urban ecosystems, and supporting urban sustainability and resilience. However, inequities in the distribution and accessibility to urban green spaces can disproportionately affect vulnerable and underserved communities. This study examines the distribution and accessibility of urban green spaces in Detroit, Michigan, using high-resolution geospatial data and geospatial analysis methods, including geographically weighted regression (GWR) and network-based analyses. The study aims to correlate urban green space access inequities with social and environmental justice indicators and offer strategies for urban planners to identify and address green space inequities using geospatial analysis. The case study identifies significant urban green space inequities, with 87 % (53 %) of buildings lacking a park or recreational area within a quarter-mile (half-mile) walking distance. GWR analysis further demonstrates that neighborhoods with higher social vulnerability scores tend to have significantly lower green space availability, although park areas appear to be equitably distributed in some parts of the city. These findings highlight critical areas in Detroit that can be prioritized for green space development to address these inequities and create healthier, more resilient urban environments. The methods presented can be applied to other cities to assist urban planners in identifying where resources can be most efficiently allocated to address current green space disparities, particularly in historically underserved areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 128716"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725000500","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban green spaces play a vital role in promoting human health and well-being, enhancing urban ecosystems, and supporting urban sustainability and resilience. However, inequities in the distribution and accessibility to urban green spaces can disproportionately affect vulnerable and underserved communities. This study examines the distribution and accessibility of urban green spaces in Detroit, Michigan, using high-resolution geospatial data and geospatial analysis methods, including geographically weighted regression (GWR) and network-based analyses. The study aims to correlate urban green space access inequities with social and environmental justice indicators and offer strategies for urban planners to identify and address green space inequities using geospatial analysis. The case study identifies significant urban green space inequities, with 87 % (53 %) of buildings lacking a park or recreational area within a quarter-mile (half-mile) walking distance. GWR analysis further demonstrates that neighborhoods with higher social vulnerability scores tend to have significantly lower green space availability, although park areas appear to be equitably distributed in some parts of the city. These findings highlight critical areas in Detroit that can be prioritized for green space development to address these inequities and create healthier, more resilient urban environments. The methods presented can be applied to other cities to assist urban planners in identifying where resources can be most efficiently allocated to address current green space disparities, particularly in historically underserved areas.
促进城市绿地公平的地理空间分析——以美国密歇根州底特律市为例
城市绿地在促进人类健康和福祉、增强城市生态系统、支持城市可持续性和韧性方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,城市绿地分布和可及性方面的不平等会对脆弱和服务不足的社区造成不成比例的影响。本研究利用高分辨率地理空间数据和地理空间分析方法,包括地理加权回归(GWR)和基于网络的分析,对密歇根州底特律市城市绿地的分布和可达性进行了研究。该研究旨在将城市绿地获取不平等与社会和环境正义指标联系起来,并为城市规划者提供利用地理空间分析识别和解决绿地不平等问题的策略。该案例研究确定了显著的城市绿地不平等,87% %(53 %)的建筑在四分之一英里(半英里)的步行距离内缺乏公园或休闲区。GWR分析进一步表明,社会脆弱性得分较高的社区往往具有明显较低的绿地可用性,尽管公园区域在城市的某些地区似乎分布公平。这些发现突出了底特律可以优先发展绿色空间的关键领域,以解决这些不平等问题,创造更健康、更有弹性的城市环境。所提出的方法可以应用于其他城市,以帮助城市规划者确定在哪里可以最有效地分配资源,以解决当前的绿色空间差距,特别是在历史上服务不足的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信