Assessing recreationists’ preferences of the landscape and species using crowdsourced images and machine learning

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Abdesslam Chai-allah , Johannes Hermes , Anne De La Foye , Zander S. Venter , Frédéric Joly , Gilles Brunschwig , Sandro Bimonte , Nathan Fox
{"title":"Assessing recreationists’ preferences of the landscape and species using crowdsourced images and machine learning","authors":"Abdesslam Chai-allah ,&nbsp;Johannes Hermes ,&nbsp;Anne De La Foye ,&nbsp;Zander S. Venter ,&nbsp;Frédéric Joly ,&nbsp;Gilles Brunschwig ,&nbsp;Sandro Bimonte ,&nbsp;Nathan Fox","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Crowdsourced data are now well-established for assessing cultural ecosystem services (CES). In rural areas, understanding which land covers people prefer to recreate in, and how these land covers provide different CES, is necessary to support sustainable use. In this study, we aim to assess recreationists’ revealed preferences of landscape aesthetics and species observation as two CES, considering multiple land cover types in a rural area in France. This assessment was carried out using georeferenced images from two crowdsourced sources (Flickr and Wikiloc) and by analyzing their content using a machine-learning algorithm. We further developed a framework to classify images based on their content into CES-related images (those depicting landscapes or species) and non-CES-related images. Finally, we assessed how images depicting landscape aesthetics and species observation are distributed across the land covers visited by recreationists, and which species groups are the most photographed. Our results showed the dominance of images of open landscape views over close-up species images, and that grasslands are the primary providers of open views. In addition, we found that forests also provide open landscape views, suggesting that forests with gaps in canopy cover and viewpoints can be as important as grasslands in providing aesthetic views, especially in hilly landscapes. For species, the category “plants and flowers“ was the most photographed, followed by invertebrates and birds on Flickr, and domestic livestock on Wikiloc. This study provides insights into the importance of using multiple crowdsourced sources in CES assessment, providing critical insights for both landscape managers and conservationists.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 105315"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204625000222","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crowdsourced data are now well-established for assessing cultural ecosystem services (CES). In rural areas, understanding which land covers people prefer to recreate in, and how these land covers provide different CES, is necessary to support sustainable use. In this study, we aim to assess recreationists’ revealed preferences of landscape aesthetics and species observation as two CES, considering multiple land cover types in a rural area in France. This assessment was carried out using georeferenced images from two crowdsourced sources (Flickr and Wikiloc) and by analyzing their content using a machine-learning algorithm. We further developed a framework to classify images based on their content into CES-related images (those depicting landscapes or species) and non-CES-related images. Finally, we assessed how images depicting landscape aesthetics and species observation are distributed across the land covers visited by recreationists, and which species groups are the most photographed. Our results showed the dominance of images of open landscape views over close-up species images, and that grasslands are the primary providers of open views. In addition, we found that forests also provide open landscape views, suggesting that forests with gaps in canopy cover and viewpoints can be as important as grasslands in providing aesthetic views, especially in hilly landscapes. For species, the category “plants and flowers“ was the most photographed, followed by invertebrates and birds on Flickr, and domestic livestock on Wikiloc. This study provides insights into the importance of using multiple crowdsourced sources in CES assessment, providing critical insights for both landscape managers and conservationists.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信