Assessing recreationists’ preferences of the landscape and species using crowdsourced images and machine learning

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Abdesslam Chai-allah , Johannes Hermes , Anne De La Foye , Zander S. Venter , Frédéric Joly , Gilles Brunschwig , Sandro Bimonte , Nathan Fox
{"title":"Assessing recreationists’ preferences of the landscape and species using crowdsourced images and machine learning","authors":"Abdesslam Chai-allah ,&nbsp;Johannes Hermes ,&nbsp;Anne De La Foye ,&nbsp;Zander S. Venter ,&nbsp;Frédéric Joly ,&nbsp;Gilles Brunschwig ,&nbsp;Sandro Bimonte ,&nbsp;Nathan Fox","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Crowdsourced data are now well-established for assessing cultural ecosystem services (CES). In rural areas, understanding which land covers people prefer to recreate in, and how these land covers provide different CES, is necessary to support sustainable use. In this study, we aim to assess recreationists’ revealed preferences of landscape aesthetics and species observation as two CES, considering multiple land cover types in a rural area in France. This assessment was carried out using georeferenced images from two crowdsourced sources (Flickr and Wikiloc) and by analyzing their content using a machine-learning algorithm. We further developed a framework to classify images based on their content into CES-related images (those depicting landscapes or species) and non-CES-related images. Finally, we assessed how images depicting landscape aesthetics and species observation are distributed across the land covers visited by recreationists, and which species groups are the most photographed. Our results showed the dominance of images of open landscape views over close-up species images, and that grasslands are the primary providers of open views. In addition, we found that forests also provide open landscape views, suggesting that forests with gaps in canopy cover and viewpoints can be as important as grasslands in providing aesthetic views, especially in hilly landscapes. For species, the category “plants and flowers“ was the most photographed, followed by invertebrates and birds on Flickr, and domestic livestock on Wikiloc. This study provides insights into the importance of using multiple crowdsourced sources in CES assessment, providing critical insights for both landscape managers and conservationists.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 105315"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204625000222","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crowdsourced data are now well-established for assessing cultural ecosystem services (CES). In rural areas, understanding which land covers people prefer to recreate in, and how these land covers provide different CES, is necessary to support sustainable use. In this study, we aim to assess recreationists’ revealed preferences of landscape aesthetics and species observation as two CES, considering multiple land cover types in a rural area in France. This assessment was carried out using georeferenced images from two crowdsourced sources (Flickr and Wikiloc) and by analyzing their content using a machine-learning algorithm. We further developed a framework to classify images based on their content into CES-related images (those depicting landscapes or species) and non-CES-related images. Finally, we assessed how images depicting landscape aesthetics and species observation are distributed across the land covers visited by recreationists, and which species groups are the most photographed. Our results showed the dominance of images of open landscape views over close-up species images, and that grasslands are the primary providers of open views. In addition, we found that forests also provide open landscape views, suggesting that forests with gaps in canopy cover and viewpoints can be as important as grasslands in providing aesthetic views, especially in hilly landscapes. For species, the category “plants and flowers“ was the most photographed, followed by invertebrates and birds on Flickr, and domestic livestock on Wikiloc. This study provides insights into the importance of using multiple crowdsourced sources in CES assessment, providing critical insights for both landscape managers and conservationists.
使用众包图像和机器学习来评估游憩者对景观和物种的偏好
目前,众包数据已被广泛用于评估文化生态系统服务(CES)。在农村地区,了解人们喜欢在哪些土地覆盖上重建,以及这些土地覆盖如何提供不同的消费能力,对于支持可持续利用是必要的。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估游憩者对景观美学和物种观察的偏好作为两个CES,考虑法国农村地区的多种土地覆盖类型。这项评估是使用来自两个众包来源(Flickr和Wikiloc)的地理参考图像进行的,并使用机器学习算法分析其内容。我们进一步开发了一个框架,根据图像的内容将图像分类为与ces相关的图像(描绘景观或物种的图像)和与ces无关的图像。最后,我们评估了描绘景观美学和物种观察的图像如何分布在游憩者访问的土地覆盖上,以及哪些物种组被拍摄最多。研究结果表明,开放景观影像的优势大于近距离物种影像,草原是开放景观的主要提供者。此外,我们还发现森林也提供开阔的景观景观,这表明在树冠覆盖和视点之间存在间隙的森林在提供美学景观方面与草原一样重要,特别是在丘陵景观中。就物种而言,“植物和花卉”是被拍照最多的类别,其次是Flickr上的无脊椎动物和鸟类,以及Wikiloc上的家畜。本研究揭示了在生态环境评估中使用多个众包资源的重要性,为景观管理者和保护主义者提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信