{"title":"The use of simulation to improve non-technical skills in undergraduate nurse education: A scoping review","authors":"Kalpana Raghunathan , Grace Solely Houghty , Yakobus Siswadi , Ni Gusti Ayu Eka , Sharon Bourke , Rachel Cardwell , Beverley Copnell , Rachael Duncan , Cheryle Moss","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This scoping review aim was to identify evidence about the use of simulation to improve nursing students’ non-technical skills in undergraduate curricula.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Simulation in nurse education is rapidly advancing in non-technical skills. Evidence for the use of simulation in improving non-technical skills remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The scoping review used procedures guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Searching was undertaken through six databases. After title, abstract and full text review, 47 papers meeting the inclusion criteria were identified for analysis and synthesis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The most frequently researched non-technical skills taught using simulation were communication and teamwork, with the most modalities being simulated patients or manikins. Few studies reported the use of evidence-based frameworks for simulation design. Forty-five studies evaluated student learning outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Communication and teamwork were highly reported aspects of non-technical skills development using simulation. Studies evaluated students’ improvement in performance and understanding regarding the non-technical skills as well as their experiences of the simulation however, the effect of the simulation intervention was not always clear.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 101686"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139925000039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
This scoping review aim was to identify evidence about the use of simulation to improve nursing students’ non-technical skills in undergraduate curricula.
Background
Simulation in nurse education is rapidly advancing in non-technical skills. Evidence for the use of simulation in improving non-technical skills remains unclear.
Methods
The scoping review used procedures guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Searching was undertaken through six databases. After title, abstract and full text review, 47 papers meeting the inclusion criteria were identified for analysis and synthesis.
Results
The most frequently researched non-technical skills taught using simulation were communication and teamwork, with the most modalities being simulated patients or manikins. Few studies reported the use of evidence-based frameworks for simulation design. Forty-five studies evaluated student learning outcomes.
Conclusion
Communication and teamwork were highly reported aspects of non-technical skills development using simulation. Studies evaluated students’ improvement in performance and understanding regarding the non-technical skills as well as their experiences of the simulation however, the effect of the simulation intervention was not always clear.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation.
We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria:
Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation
Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation
Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation
Leadership for simulation
Simulation operations
Clinical and academic uses of simulation.