Multifocal Candida infections in cancer patients face dual challenges of surgical risk and drug resistance

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Rasha M. Abdel-Hamid , Mohammed E. Abdelhafiz , Wafaa S. Khalaf , Mohamed S. Ashour
{"title":"Multifocal Candida infections in cancer patients face dual challenges of surgical risk and drug resistance","authors":"Rasha M. Abdel-Hamid ,&nbsp;Mohammed E. Abdelhafiz ,&nbsp;Wafaa S. Khalaf ,&nbsp;Mohamed S. Ashour","doi":"10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.116726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multifocal <em>Candida</em> infections represent a serious threat for cancer patients, often leading to increased mortality. This study investigates the risk factors and outcomes for multifocal <em>Candida</em> infections compared to single-site infections and evaluates species distribution and antifungal susceptibility patterns. Fifty-seven <em>Candida</em> isolates were obtained from 23 cancer patients with multifocal infections. Another 57 isolates were collected from 57 matched patients with single-site infections. Germ tube test and CHROMAgar medium were used for species identification. Antifungal susceptibility of amphotericin B, caspofungin, fluconazole, and voriconazole was determined following the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI), M60-Ed2. Of the 80 cancer patients, the majority of cases involved solid tumors (85.0 %), with gastrointestinal cancer being the most common in both multifocal and single-focal groups (<em>p</em> = 0.207). Significantly more patients with multifocal infections were admitted to the ICU compared to those with single-site infections (60.9 % versus 34.0 %, <em>p</em> = 0.029). Surgical procedures independently increased the risk for multifocal infections (OR: 10.506, <em>p</em> = 0.047). Multifocal infections had a significantly higher mortality rate than single-site infections (69.6 % versus 42.1 %, OR: 3.143, <em>p</em> = 0.026). Non-albicans <em>Candida</em> (NAC) species constituted 57.9 % (n = 66) of the 114 isolates, with <em>Candida glabrata</em> being the most prevalent (n = 49, 43.0 %). All tested antifungals revealed high resistance rates, particularly amphotericin B (79.8 %) and fluconazole (53.5 %). NAC species demonstrated significantly higher resistance rates than <em>Candida albicans</em>. Multifocal <em>Candida</em> infections in cancer patients showed higher mortality, with surgical procedures and ICU admission as key risk factors. The increasingly prevalent resistant NAC species, particularly <em>C. glabrata</em>, need accurate identification, antifungal stewardship, and new therapeutic strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11329,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","volume":"111 4","pages":"Article 116726"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732889325000495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multifocal Candida infections represent a serious threat for cancer patients, often leading to increased mortality. This study investigates the risk factors and outcomes for multifocal Candida infections compared to single-site infections and evaluates species distribution and antifungal susceptibility patterns. Fifty-seven Candida isolates were obtained from 23 cancer patients with multifocal infections. Another 57 isolates were collected from 57 matched patients with single-site infections. Germ tube test and CHROMAgar medium were used for species identification. Antifungal susceptibility of amphotericin B, caspofungin, fluconazole, and voriconazole was determined following the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI), M60-Ed2. Of the 80 cancer patients, the majority of cases involved solid tumors (85.0 %), with gastrointestinal cancer being the most common in both multifocal and single-focal groups (p = 0.207). Significantly more patients with multifocal infections were admitted to the ICU compared to those with single-site infections (60.9 % versus 34.0 %, p = 0.029). Surgical procedures independently increased the risk for multifocal infections (OR: 10.506, p = 0.047). Multifocal infections had a significantly higher mortality rate than single-site infections (69.6 % versus 42.1 %, OR: 3.143, p = 0.026). Non-albicans Candida (NAC) species constituted 57.9 % (n = 66) of the 114 isolates, with Candida glabrata being the most prevalent (n = 49, 43.0 %). All tested antifungals revealed high resistance rates, particularly amphotericin B (79.8 %) and fluconazole (53.5 %). NAC species demonstrated significantly higher resistance rates than Candida albicans. Multifocal Candida infections in cancer patients showed higher mortality, with surgical procedures and ICU admission as key risk factors. The increasingly prevalent resistant NAC species, particularly C. glabrata, need accurate identification, antifungal stewardship, and new therapeutic strategies.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease keeps you informed of the latest developments in clinical microbiology and the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Packed with rigorously peer-reviewed articles and studies in bacteriology, immunology, immunoserology, infectious diseases, mycology, parasitology, and virology, the journal examines new procedures, unusual cases, controversial issues, and important new literature. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease distinguished independent editorial board, consisting of experts from many medical specialties, ensures you extensive and authoritative coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信