Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of prosthetic rehabilitation for partially edentulous teeth in India: A comparative study of Clasp-Retained RPDs, Thermoplastic Resin RPDs, and Cast Partial Dentures

Q1 Medicine

Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.01.014

Subhash V , Aswini Kumar K , Vineetha Karuveettil

{"title":"Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of prosthetic rehabilitation for partially edentulous teeth in India: A comparative study of Clasp-Retained RPDs, Thermoplastic Resin RPDs, and Cast Partial Dentures","authors":"Subhash V , Aswini Kumar K , Vineetha Karuveettil","doi":"10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>With rising life expectancy, partial edentulism has increased, particularly in developing nations where economic constraints, limited awareness, and inadequate dental care exacerbate the burden on aging populations. Patients with fewer than 20 teeth often experience a reduction in Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL), emphasizing the need for effective tooth replacement. Removable partial dentures (RPDs) are versatile, cost-effective solutions for partial tooth loss, including metal clasp-retained RPDs (MC-RPDs), thermoplastic resin RPDs (TR-RPDs), and cast partial dentures (CPDs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study evaluates the oral health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness of these three RPD types. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 42 participants, divided into three groups: MC-RPD, TR-RPD, and CPD, each with 14 patients. The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and Satisfaction Questionnaire (SAT) were administered at baseline and three months post-denture delivery. The study adhered to Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results showed significant differences in OHIP scores between the groups, with CPD offering the highest quality of life, followed by TR-RPD, and MC-RPD. Post-treatment, the mean OHIP scores for MC-RPD, TR-RPD, and CPD were 30.57 ± 4.09, 20.71 ± 4.03, and 22.36 ± 2.92, respectively, with CPD showing the greatest improvement. Patient satisfaction was highest for CPD, followed by TR-RPD, and least for MC-RPD. However, satisfaction differences between the groups were not statistically significant after three months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the superior performance of CPDs in enhancing OHRQoL and patient satisfaction, though their higher cost may limit accessibility. These findings provide valuable insights for dental practitioners and patients in selecting the most suitable and cost-effective RPD treatment options.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 240-245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426825000168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

With rising life expectancy, partial edentulism has increased, particularly in developing nations where economic constraints, limited awareness, and inadequate dental care exacerbate the burden on aging populations. Patients with fewer than 20 teeth often experience a reduction in Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL), emphasizing the need for effective tooth replacement. Removable partial dentures (RPDs) are versatile, cost-effective solutions for partial tooth loss, including metal clasp-retained RPDs (MC-RPDs), thermoplastic resin RPDs (TR-RPDs), and cast partial dentures (CPDs).

Methods

This study evaluates the oral health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness of these three RPD types. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 42 participants, divided into three groups: MC-RPD, TR-RPD, and CPD, each with 14 patients. The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and Satisfaction Questionnaire (SAT) were administered at baseline and three months post-denture delivery. The study adhered to Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards.

Results

Results showed significant differences in OHIP scores between the groups, with CPD offering the highest quality of life, followed by TR-RPD, and MC-RPD. Post-treatment, the mean OHIP scores for MC-RPD, TR-RPD, and CPD were 30.57 ± 4.09, 20.71 ± 4.03, and 22.36 ± 2.92, respectively, with CPD showing the greatest improvement. Patient satisfaction was highest for CPD, followed by TR-RPD, and least for MC-RPD. However, satisfaction differences between the groups were not statistically significant after three months.

Conclusion

This study highlights the superior performance of CPDs in enhancing OHRQoL and patient satisfaction, though their higher cost may limit accessibility. These findings provide valuable insights for dental practitioners and patients in selecting the most suitable and cost-effective RPD treatment options.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

133

审稿时长

167 days

期刊介绍： Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (JOBCR)is the official journal of the Craniofacial Research Foundation (CRF). The journal aims to provide a common platform for both clinical and translational research and to promote interdisciplinary sciences in craniofacial region. JOBCR publishes content that includes diseases, injuries and defects in the head, neck, face, jaws and the hard and soft tissues of the mouth and jaws and face region; diagnosis and medical management of diseases specific to the orofacial tissues and of oral manifestations of systemic diseases; studies on identifying populations at risk of oral disease or in need of specific care, and comparing regional, environmental, social, and access similarities and differences in dental care between populations; diseases of the mouth and related structures like salivary glands, temporomandibular joints, facial muscles and perioral skin; biomedical engineering, tissue engineering and stem cells. The journal publishes reviews, commentaries, peer-reviewed original research articles, short communication, and case reports.