An optimization framework for component sizing and energy management of hybrid electrolyzer systems considering physical characteristics of alkaline electrolyzers and proton exchange membrane electrolyzers

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Yuzhen Tang , Zhuoqun Zheng , Fanqi Min , Jingying Xie , Hengzhao Yang
{"title":"An optimization framework for component sizing and energy management of hybrid electrolyzer systems considering physical characteristics of alkaline electrolyzers and proton exchange membrane electrolyzers","authors":"Yuzhen Tang ,&nbsp;Zhuoqun Zheng ,&nbsp;Fanqi Min ,&nbsp;Jingying Xie ,&nbsp;Hengzhao Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2025.122555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper proposes to produce hydrogen using a hybrid electrolyzer system (HES) incorporating the alkaline electrolyzer (AEL) and the proton exchange membrane electrolyzer (PEMEL) technologies in the context of renewable energy sources (RESs). To solve the component sizing and energy management problems for the HES, this paper develops an optimization framework by taking into account the physical characteristics of AELs and PEMELs. In particular, the operating power range of the AEL is determined based on its hydrogen to oxygen (HTO) threshold (for the lower bound) and overloading capability (for the upper bound). The dynamic response characteristics of AELs and PEMELs as well as supercapacitors are considered in that their dynamic responses are parameterized as affine functions of the RES power fluctuations. The effectiveness of the proposed optimization framework is validated using a case study involving both offline and online simulations. Results show that the system revenue of the HES is the highest (1451.05 ¥) compared to the AEL-only (1411.84 ¥) and PEMEL-only (1254.36 ¥) configurations. The energy efficiency of the HES (108.05%) is significantly higher than that of the AEL-only system (95.97%). Therefore, the HES configuration is both technically and economically feasible and beneficial compared to the AEL-only and PEMEL-only configurations for hydrogen production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":"243 ","pages":"Article 122555"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125002174","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper proposes to produce hydrogen using a hybrid electrolyzer system (HES) incorporating the alkaline electrolyzer (AEL) and the proton exchange membrane electrolyzer (PEMEL) technologies in the context of renewable energy sources (RESs). To solve the component sizing and energy management problems for the HES, this paper develops an optimization framework by taking into account the physical characteristics of AELs and PEMELs. In particular, the operating power range of the AEL is determined based on its hydrogen to oxygen (HTO) threshold (for the lower bound) and overloading capability (for the upper bound). The dynamic response characteristics of AELs and PEMELs as well as supercapacitors are considered in that their dynamic responses are parameterized as affine functions of the RES power fluctuations. The effectiveness of the proposed optimization framework is validated using a case study involving both offline and online simulations. Results show that the system revenue of the HES is the highest (1451.05 ¥) compared to the AEL-only (1411.84 ¥) and PEMEL-only (1254.36 ¥) configurations. The energy efficiency of the HES (108.05%) is significantly higher than that of the AEL-only system (95.97%). Therefore, the HES configuration is both technically and economically feasible and beneficial compared to the AEL-only and PEMEL-only configurations for hydrogen production.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
1955
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices. As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信