Confusion and confusion regulation: An empirical investigation of the emotion regulation in achievement situations model

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Krista R. Muis , Martina Kohatsu , Reinhard Pekrun , Shasha Li
{"title":"Confusion and confusion regulation: An empirical investigation of the emotion regulation in achievement situations model","authors":"Krista R. Muis ,&nbsp;Martina Kohatsu ,&nbsp;Reinhard Pekrun ,&nbsp;Shasha Li","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examined the antecedents and consequences of confusion and confusion regulation during complex statistics problem-solving. One hundred sixty-eight university students from Canada, the US, and the UK reported their trait-like habitual confusion regarding statistics, and perceptions of control for solving complex statistics problems. After learning about the binomial theorem, students were asked to solve three complex statistics problems. A think-emote-aloud protocol was used to capture confusion and confusion regulation during problem-solving. Following problem completion, students reported the intensity of the confusion they felt during problem-solving, their perceptions of control during problem-solving, along with the frequency with which they used confusion regulation strategies, including competence development, cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, and control-focused strategies. Path analyses revealed that initial confusion about statistics negatively predicted students’ initial perceived control for the task, and that initial perceived control negatively predicted confusion experienced during problem-solving. Initial perceived control also served as a positive antecedent to competence development. Confusion did not predict any confusion regulation strategies but moderated cognitive reappraisal and suppression whereby only higher levels of confusion predicted higher levels of those two strategies. Confusion during problem-solving also negatively predicted perceived control during problem-solving, which subsequently predicted problem-solving achievement. Finally, competence development and the use of control-focused strategies positively predicted perceived control during problem-solving. Results indicate that perceived control serves as an important antecedent to confusion regulation, that confusion moderates these relations, and support the reciprocity of Emotions in Achievement Situations (ERAS) model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 102350"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X25000153","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined the antecedents and consequences of confusion and confusion regulation during complex statistics problem-solving. One hundred sixty-eight university students from Canada, the US, and the UK reported their trait-like habitual confusion regarding statistics, and perceptions of control for solving complex statistics problems. After learning about the binomial theorem, students were asked to solve three complex statistics problems. A think-emote-aloud protocol was used to capture confusion and confusion regulation during problem-solving. Following problem completion, students reported the intensity of the confusion they felt during problem-solving, their perceptions of control during problem-solving, along with the frequency with which they used confusion regulation strategies, including competence development, cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, and control-focused strategies. Path analyses revealed that initial confusion about statistics negatively predicted students’ initial perceived control for the task, and that initial perceived control negatively predicted confusion experienced during problem-solving. Initial perceived control also served as a positive antecedent to competence development. Confusion did not predict any confusion regulation strategies but moderated cognitive reappraisal and suppression whereby only higher levels of confusion predicted higher levels of those two strategies. Confusion during problem-solving also negatively predicted perceived control during problem-solving, which subsequently predicted problem-solving achievement. Finally, competence development and the use of control-focused strategies positively predicted perceived control during problem-solving. Results indicate that perceived control serves as an important antecedent to confusion regulation, that confusion moderates these relations, and support the reciprocity of Emotions in Achievement Situations (ERAS) model.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Contemporary Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信