Mateus Pimenta Arruda, Sara Hira, Rian Vilar Lima, Larissa Irigoyen Teixeira Barbosa, Mariana Tosato Zinher, Lubna Al-Sharif, João Lucas de Magalhães Leal Moreira, Giulia Steuernagel Del Valle
{"title":"Pharmacological therapy for relieving pain in panretinal photocoagulation: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Mateus Pimenta Arruda, Sara Hira, Rian Vilar Lima, Larissa Irigoyen Teixeira Barbosa, Mariana Tosato Zinher, Lubna Al-Sharif, João Lucas de Magalhães Leal Moreira, Giulia Steuernagel Del Valle","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.01.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) can help compare the various types of analgesics and anesthetics used for lowering pain of panretinal photocoagulation. We carried out a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess pharmacological interventions for relieving pain in patients undergoing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). We included 15 randomized controlled trials and 4 crossover trials with a total of 1787 eyes and 45.83 % of the participants were female. The mean age of the participants was 55 years. 2 % peribulbar lidocaine was the only significant treatment compared to placebo (MD -2.4 (95 % CrI -4.7 to -0.20). The rank probability and SUCRA also revealed 2 % peribulbar lidocaine (0.887) as the best treatment in terms of lowering the pain scores followed by etoricoxib (0.809) and potassium diclofenac (0.727). Two per cent peribulbar lidocaine is effective for reducing procedural pain in laser treatment compared to systemic and topical medications. Future studies should evaluate drugs that can reach and act on the posterior segment of the eye.</p>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.01.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) can help compare the various types of analgesics and anesthetics used for lowering pain of panretinal photocoagulation. We carried out a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess pharmacological interventions for relieving pain in patients undergoing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). We included 15 randomized controlled trials and 4 crossover trials with a total of 1787 eyes and 45.83 % of the participants were female. The mean age of the participants was 55 years. 2 % peribulbar lidocaine was the only significant treatment compared to placebo (MD -2.4 (95 % CrI -4.7 to -0.20). The rank probability and SUCRA also revealed 2 % peribulbar lidocaine (0.887) as the best treatment in terms of lowering the pain scores followed by etoricoxib (0.809) and potassium diclofenac (0.727). Two per cent peribulbar lidocaine is effective for reducing procedural pain in laser treatment compared to systemic and topical medications. Future studies should evaluate drugs that can reach and act on the posterior segment of the eye.
期刊介绍:
Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.