Peer-assisted telemedicine hepatitis-C treatment for people who use drugs in rural communities: a mixed methods study.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Kim Hoffman, Gillian Leichtling, Sarah Shin, Andrew Seaman, Tonhi Gailey, Hunter C Spencer, P Todd Korthuis
{"title":"Peer-assisted telemedicine hepatitis-C treatment for people who use drugs in rural communities: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Kim Hoffman, Gillian Leichtling, Sarah Shin, Andrew Seaman, Tonhi Gailey, Hunter C Spencer, P Todd Korthuis","doi":"10.1186/s13722-025-00541-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increase in opioid use disorder among young, nonurban people has fueled sharp rises in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. Innovative treatment models are needed that circumvent healthcare system barriers for people who use drugs (PWUD), particularly in rural areas. The Oregon HOPE TeleHCV study randomized PWUD living with HCV in rural Oregon to peer-facilitated and streamlined telemedicine HCV treatment (Peer TeleHCV) versus enhanced usual care (EUC) and assessed sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post treatment (SVR12). Peer Support Specialists (peers) conducted HCV screening in the community, facilitated pretreatment evaluation and linkage to telemedicine HCV treatment clinicians, and supported Peer TeleHCV study participants in HCV medication adherence. A qualitative investigation queried telemedicine clinicians and peers about their experiences with the implementation of the model and key drivers of implementation effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two remote audio/video recorded focus groups were conducted, one with the study's clinicians and one with the peers. Participants were asked their views of key elements for successful implementation and outcomes of the Peer TeleHCV model. Group interviews lasted one hour. Recordings were professionally transcribed for thematic analysis with a mixed deductive and inductive framework, using Atlas.ti. Patients were surveyed about their interactions and satisfaction with peers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative data (n = 78) indicated patients had high levels of satisfaction with and support from the peers. Three themes were identified from the qualitative data (n = 12) including. (1) Key peer-level elements such as providing support during potentially difficult lab draws, creating a peer-facilitated \"bubble of trust\" between patients and clinicians, enabling technology access, conducting outreach to maintain contact and support treatment retention, and facilitating stabilizing wrap-around services (e.g., housing vouchers) (2) Key clinician-level factors such as capacity for unscheduled peer-facilitated appointments, having dedicated time for case consults with peers, and clinicians trained in working with PWUD and skilled in identifying related clinical concerns (3) Key systems-level elements such as standing lab orders, challenges related to specialty pharmacies and Medicaid managed care organizations, and streamlined communication strategies between peers and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All participants reported that the Peer TeleHCV model built trust and eased barriers for PWUD initiating and remaining in HCV treatment. This low-barrier model makes space for PWUD to receive HCV treatment, regardless of drug use. Implementing support from peer specialists, telemedicine technology, and streamlined testing and treatment strategies may connect more rural PWUD living with HCV with the cure.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00541-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increase in opioid use disorder among young, nonurban people has fueled sharp rises in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. Innovative treatment models are needed that circumvent healthcare system barriers for people who use drugs (PWUD), particularly in rural areas. The Oregon HOPE TeleHCV study randomized PWUD living with HCV in rural Oregon to peer-facilitated and streamlined telemedicine HCV treatment (Peer TeleHCV) versus enhanced usual care (EUC) and assessed sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post treatment (SVR12). Peer Support Specialists (peers) conducted HCV screening in the community, facilitated pretreatment evaluation and linkage to telemedicine HCV treatment clinicians, and supported Peer TeleHCV study participants in HCV medication adherence. A qualitative investigation queried telemedicine clinicians and peers about their experiences with the implementation of the model and key drivers of implementation effectiveness.

Methods: Two remote audio/video recorded focus groups were conducted, one with the study's clinicians and one with the peers. Participants were asked their views of key elements for successful implementation and outcomes of the Peer TeleHCV model. Group interviews lasted one hour. Recordings were professionally transcribed for thematic analysis with a mixed deductive and inductive framework, using Atlas.ti. Patients were surveyed about their interactions and satisfaction with peers.

Results: Quantitative data (n = 78) indicated patients had high levels of satisfaction with and support from the peers. Three themes were identified from the qualitative data (n = 12) including. (1) Key peer-level elements such as providing support during potentially difficult lab draws, creating a peer-facilitated "bubble of trust" between patients and clinicians, enabling technology access, conducting outreach to maintain contact and support treatment retention, and facilitating stabilizing wrap-around services (e.g., housing vouchers) (2) Key clinician-level factors such as capacity for unscheduled peer-facilitated appointments, having dedicated time for case consults with peers, and clinicians trained in working with PWUD and skilled in identifying related clinical concerns (3) Key systems-level elements such as standing lab orders, challenges related to specialty pharmacies and Medicaid managed care organizations, and streamlined communication strategies between peers and clinicians.

Conclusion: All participants reported that the Peer TeleHCV model built trust and eased barriers for PWUD initiating and remaining in HCV treatment. This low-barrier model makes space for PWUD to receive HCV treatment, regardless of drug use. Implementing support from peer specialists, telemedicine technology, and streamlined testing and treatment strategies may connect more rural PWUD living with HCV with the cure.

对农村社区吸毒者的同行辅助远程医疗丙型肝炎治疗:一项混合方法研究。
背景:年轻人、非城市人群中阿片类药物使用障碍的增加导致丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染急剧上升。需要创新的治疗模式,以规避卫生保健系统对吸毒者的障碍,特别是在农村地区。Oregon HOPE TeleHCV研究将俄勒冈州农村地区携带HCV的PWUD随机分为同行促进和简化的远程医疗HCV治疗(Peer TeleHCV)和增强常规护理(EUC),并评估治疗后12周的持续病毒学反应(SVR12)。同伴支持专家(peers)在社区进行HCV筛查,促进预处理评估和与远程医疗HCV治疗临床医生的联系,并支持同伴远程HCV研究参与者的HCV药物依从性。一项定性调查向远程医疗临床医生和同行询问了他们在实施该模型方面的经验和实施有效性的关键驱动因素。方法:进行两个远程音频/视频记录焦点小组,一个是研究的临床医生,一个是同行。与会者被问及他们对成功实施对等TeleHCV模式的关键要素和成果的看法。小组面试持续了一个小时。录音经过专业转录,使用Atlas.ti进行混合演绎和归纳框架的专题分析。研究人员调查了患者与同伴的互动和满意度。结果:定量数据(n = 78)表明患者对同伴的满意度和支持度较高。从定性数据(n = 12)中确定了三个主题,包括。(1)关键的同行水平因素,如在潜在困难的实验室抽取过程中提供支持,在患者和临床医生之间创造同行促进的“信任泡沫”,使技术获得成为可能,开展外展以保持联系并支持治疗保留,以及促进稳定的综合服务(例如住房券)。(2)关键的临床水平因素,如非安排的同行促进预约的能力,有专门的时间与同行进行病例咨询。(3)关键的系统级元素,如长期实验室订单,与专业药房和医疗补助管理的医疗机构相关的挑战,以及同行和临床医生之间的精简沟通策略。结论:所有参与者都报告了Peer TeleHCV模型建立了信任,减轻了PWUD开始和继续HCV治疗的障碍。这种低屏障模式为PWUD接受HCV治疗创造了空间,无论药物使用情况如何。实施来自同行专家的支持、远程医疗技术以及简化的检测和治疗策略,可能会使更多携带丙型肝炎病毒的农村puwud患者获得治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations. Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信