CARAvELA - Competency in Anaesthesiology - self-Reported Assessment on European Learning Aims: a national survey.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2025.2463483
Carmen Oliveira, Marta Dias Vaz, Luís Gonçalves, Henrique Gouveia, Andrea Tomassi, Andrea Falegnami, Alessandro Caforio, Alessandro Scudelari, Fátima Lima, Federico Bilotta
{"title":"CARAvELA - Competency in Anaesthesiology - self-Reported Assessment on European Learning Aims: a national survey.","authors":"Carmen Oliveira, Marta Dias Vaz, Luís Gonçalves, Henrique Gouveia, Andrea Tomassi, Andrea Falegnami, Alessandro Caforio, Alessandro Scudelari, Fátima Lima, Federico Bilotta","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2025.2463483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Competency-based teaching is the preferred approach for anaesthesia training, however, limited data exists on Portuguese residents' exposure to essential competencies. This study aimed to evaluate their daily exposure to seven selected competencies from the 2022 European Training Requirements (ETR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted amongst 350 Portuguese anaesthesia residents, throughout a 10 working day period, using a questionnaire with 170 questions. Participants were on either anaesthesia or intensive care unit rotation. Demographic data and scores of exposures to selected competencies were gathered. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, comparison of means and a Linear Mixed Model using the restricted maximum likelihood estimation method. The significance threshold was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding ETR competency exposure, no statistical differences were found based on gender. Residents reported statistically significant higher levels of exposure to competencies while in anaesthesia rotations, except for lung, cardiac and Point-of Care ultrasound. Apart from ultrasound and academic research activities, the maximum exposure level was attained only during anaesthesia rotations. There was no reported exposure to airway ultrasound in any rotation. Exposure to academic research activities, in a scale from 0 to 5, was on average below one. The average reported values for direct patient communication were the highest. As expected, the fifth-year residents reported overall higher scores. Residents from the North reported lower scores for general anaesthesia maintenance, peripheral regional anaesthesia, airway intubation and ventilation management, but higher scores of exposures to academic research activities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Adopting a national logbook, formative regular assessment, supporting the trainers as well as strategies to improve competencies in academic research activities and ultrasound training are recommendations to improve the Portuguese training curricula.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addressing the gaps between expected and monitored competencies contributes to the advancement of anaesthesiology training. The survey drew attention to the ETR among the residents.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable - registered on OSF Registries.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"30 1","pages":"2463483"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2463483","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Competency-based teaching is the preferred approach for anaesthesia training, however, limited data exists on Portuguese residents' exposure to essential competencies. This study aimed to evaluate their daily exposure to seven selected competencies from the 2022 European Training Requirements (ETR).

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted amongst 350 Portuguese anaesthesia residents, throughout a 10 working day period, using a questionnaire with 170 questions. Participants were on either anaesthesia or intensive care unit rotation. Demographic data and scores of exposures to selected competencies were gathered. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, comparison of means and a Linear Mixed Model using the restricted maximum likelihood estimation method. The significance threshold was set at p < 0.05.

Results: Regarding ETR competency exposure, no statistical differences were found based on gender. Residents reported statistically significant higher levels of exposure to competencies while in anaesthesia rotations, except for lung, cardiac and Point-of Care ultrasound. Apart from ultrasound and academic research activities, the maximum exposure level was attained only during anaesthesia rotations. There was no reported exposure to airway ultrasound in any rotation. Exposure to academic research activities, in a scale from 0 to 5, was on average below one. The average reported values for direct patient communication were the highest. As expected, the fifth-year residents reported overall higher scores. Residents from the North reported lower scores for general anaesthesia maintenance, peripheral regional anaesthesia, airway intubation and ventilation management, but higher scores of exposures to academic research activities.

Discussion: Adopting a national logbook, formative regular assessment, supporting the trainers as well as strategies to improve competencies in academic research activities and ultrasound training are recommendations to improve the Portuguese training curricula.

Conclusion: Addressing the gaps between expected and monitored competencies contributes to the advancement of anaesthesiology training. The survey drew attention to the ETR among the residents.

Trial registration: Not applicable - registered on OSF Registries.

CARAvELA -麻醉学能力-欧洲学习目标自我报告评估:一项全国性调查。
导读:以能力为基础的教学是麻醉培训的首选方法,然而,关于葡萄牙居民接触基本能力的数据有限。本研究旨在评估他们每天从2022年欧洲培训要求(ETR)中选择的七项能力。方法:对350名葡萄牙麻醉住院医师进行横断面调查,为期10个工作日,采用问卷调查170个问题。参与者在麻醉或重症监护病房轮转。收集了人口统计数据和接触选定能力的分数。统计分析包括描述性统计、均值比较和使用限制最大似然估计方法的线性混合模型。结果:在ETR胜任力暴露方面,性别差异无统计学意义。除肺、心脏和护理点超声外,住院医生报告在麻醉旋转时暴露于能力的统计水平显著较高。除了超声和学术研究活动外,最大暴露水平仅在麻醉旋转期间达到。没有任何旋转气道超声暴露的报道。在从0到5的范围内,对学术研究活动的接触平均低于1。患者直接沟通的平均报告值最高。不出所料,第五年住院医生报告的总体得分更高。据报道,来自北方的居民在全身麻醉维持、周围区域麻醉、气道插管和通气管理方面得分较低,但在学术研究活动方面得分较高。讨论:采用国家日志、形成性定期评估、支持培训人员以及提高学术研究活动和超声培训能力的战略是改进葡萄牙语培训课程的建议。结论:解决预期能力和监测能力之间的差距有助于麻醉学培训的进步。该调查引起了居民对ETR的关注。试验注册:不适用-在OSF注册中心注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信