Jeanette M Garcia, Samantha M Ross-Cypcar, Justin A Haegele
{"title":"Differences in prescription drug misuse among U.S. adults with and without disabilities.","authors":"Jeanette M Garcia, Samantha M Ross-Cypcar, Justin A Haegele","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.01.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Increasing evidence suggests that adults with disabilities have higher rates of drug misuse compared to adults without disabilities, however; there is limited information on rates of commonly misused prescription drugs (e.g., stimulants, opioids, tranquilizers) to quantify the magnitude of this disparity. Thus, the purpose of this cross-sectional study is to examine and compare prevalence rates of prescription drug misuse by disability status and age group in a national sample of U.S. adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data (n=47,100 adults) from the 2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health was stratified by age group: 1) 18-29 years; 2) 30-49 years; 3) 50 - 64 years; and 4) 65+ years. Disability status, defined as difficulties with vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, self-care, or communication, and misuse of prescription drugs were treated as dichotomous variables. Rao-Scott Chi-squared tests examined differences in misuse between individuals with and without disabilities, by age group, and logistic regression models estimated odds ratio for past-year misuse among individuals with disabilities compared to same-age peers without disabilities. All analyses were performed in June through August 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adults with disabilities in the 18-29 and 30-49-year age groups had twice the odds of misusing stimulants, tranquilizers, and pain relivers compared to adults without disabilities. Adults with disabilities in both the 50 - 64 and 65+years age groups had over twice the odds of misusing pain relievers compared to adults without disabilities, however; there were no significant differences in stimulant or tranquilizer misuse.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the disparity in prescription drug misuse in adults with disabilities across all age groups and prescription drug category, further research should focus on prevention and treatment of misuse in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.01.025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Increasing evidence suggests that adults with disabilities have higher rates of drug misuse compared to adults without disabilities, however; there is limited information on rates of commonly misused prescription drugs (e.g., stimulants, opioids, tranquilizers) to quantify the magnitude of this disparity. Thus, the purpose of this cross-sectional study is to examine and compare prevalence rates of prescription drug misuse by disability status and age group in a national sample of U.S. adults.
Methods: Data (n=47,100 adults) from the 2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health was stratified by age group: 1) 18-29 years; 2) 30-49 years; 3) 50 - 64 years; and 4) 65+ years. Disability status, defined as difficulties with vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, self-care, or communication, and misuse of prescription drugs were treated as dichotomous variables. Rao-Scott Chi-squared tests examined differences in misuse between individuals with and without disabilities, by age group, and logistic regression models estimated odds ratio for past-year misuse among individuals with disabilities compared to same-age peers without disabilities. All analyses were performed in June through August 2024.
Results: Adults with disabilities in the 18-29 and 30-49-year age groups had twice the odds of misusing stimulants, tranquilizers, and pain relivers compared to adults without disabilities. Adults with disabilities in both the 50 - 64 and 65+years age groups had over twice the odds of misusing pain relievers compared to adults without disabilities, however; there were no significant differences in stimulant or tranquilizer misuse.
Conclusions: Given the disparity in prescription drug misuse in adults with disabilities across all age groups and prescription drug category, further research should focus on prevention and treatment of misuse in this population.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.