Cardiorespiratory Fitness Improvements Following Low-Frequency Training Are Not Inferior to High-Frequency Training Matched for Intensity and Volume.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Thomas R Tripp, Rachel S Ghitter, Hilkka Kontro, Sarah J Hargrave, Martin J Gibala, S Jalal Aboodarda, Martin J MacInnis
{"title":"Cardiorespiratory Fitness Improvements Following Low-Frequency Training Are Not Inferior to High-Frequency Training Matched for Intensity and Volume.","authors":"Thomas R Tripp, Rachel S Ghitter, Hilkka Kontro, Sarah J Hargrave, Martin J Gibala, S Jalal Aboodarda, Martin J MacInnis","doi":"10.1111/sms.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epidemiological evidence suggests low-frequency physical activity provides health benefits, but the physiological impacts of weekly training frequency are understudied. We investigated whether \"Weekend Warrior\" (WW) training was inferior to traditional, high-frequency (HF) training for improving maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O<sub>2</sub>max). The secondary aim was to assess integrative physiological adaptations to each protocol. Twenty-eight sedentary-to-recreationally-active adults aged 18-45 years (14 males and 14 females) were randomized to perform 8-weeks of HF or WW training on a cycle ergometer (either four or two sessions weekly, respectively), consisting of continuous and interval exercise, with intensity and volume matched between groups. WW training was not inferior to HF training for improving V̇O<sub>2</sub>max (mean ± standard deviation; WW: 43.5 ± 6.5 vs. 47.8 ± 6.4 mL/kg/min; HF: 42.3 ± 6.2 vs. 47.3 ± 6.7; main effect of training, p < 0.001). Severe domain cycling time-to-task-failure also increased in both groups (WW: 3.7 ± 1.6 vs. 8.6 ± 3.2 min; HF: 3.5 ± 0.9 vs. 7.7 ± 2.8; main effect of training: p < 0.001). Frequency did not affect improvements in hemoglobin mass (WW: 771 ± 203 vs. 790 ± 189 g; HF: 754 ± 185 vs. 765 ± 202; main effect of training: p = 0.043) or skeletal muscle oxidative capacity (WW: 0.034 ± 0.008 vs. 0.045 ± 0.015 s<sup>-1</sup>; HF: 0.036 ± 0.011 vs. 0.041 ± 0.010; main effect of training: p = 0.002), nor did it influence improvements in cardiorespiratory, substrate oxidation, voluntary muscle contractile, and perceptual responses to submaximal exercise (interaction effect: p > 0.05 for all outcomes). Eight weeks of training improved V̇O<sub>2</sub>max and a wide range of physiological outcomes with no difference between training frequencies, suggesting that the distribution of weekly exercise volume has a limited effect during short-term training. Trial Registration: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05908578.</p>","PeriodicalId":21466,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports","volume":"35 2","pages":"e70024"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.70024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epidemiological evidence suggests low-frequency physical activity provides health benefits, but the physiological impacts of weekly training frequency are understudied. We investigated whether "Weekend Warrior" (WW) training was inferior to traditional, high-frequency (HF) training for improving maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max). The secondary aim was to assess integrative physiological adaptations to each protocol. Twenty-eight sedentary-to-recreationally-active adults aged 18-45 years (14 males and 14 females) were randomized to perform 8-weeks of HF or WW training on a cycle ergometer (either four or two sessions weekly, respectively), consisting of continuous and interval exercise, with intensity and volume matched between groups. WW training was not inferior to HF training for improving V̇O2max (mean ± standard deviation; WW: 43.5 ± 6.5 vs. 47.8 ± 6.4 mL/kg/min; HF: 42.3 ± 6.2 vs. 47.3 ± 6.7; main effect of training, p < 0.001). Severe domain cycling time-to-task-failure also increased in both groups (WW: 3.7 ± 1.6 vs. 8.6 ± 3.2 min; HF: 3.5 ± 0.9 vs. 7.7 ± 2.8; main effect of training: p < 0.001). Frequency did not affect improvements in hemoglobin mass (WW: 771 ± 203 vs. 790 ± 189 g; HF: 754 ± 185 vs. 765 ± 202; main effect of training: p = 0.043) or skeletal muscle oxidative capacity (WW: 0.034 ± 0.008 vs. 0.045 ± 0.015 s-1; HF: 0.036 ± 0.011 vs. 0.041 ± 0.010; main effect of training: p = 0.002), nor did it influence improvements in cardiorespiratory, substrate oxidation, voluntary muscle contractile, and perceptual responses to submaximal exercise (interaction effect: p > 0.05 for all outcomes). Eight weeks of training improved V̇O2max and a wide range of physiological outcomes with no difference between training frequencies, suggesting that the distribution of weekly exercise volume has a limited effect during short-term training. Trial Registration: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05908578.

低频训练对心肺功能的改善并不逊于与强度和量相匹配的高频训练。
流行病学证据表明,低频率的体育活动对健康有益,但每周训练频率的生理影响尚未得到充分研究。我们调查了“周末战士”(WW)训练在提高最大摄氧量(V * O2max)方面是否不如传统的高频(HF)训练。第二个目的是评估对每个方案的综合生理适应。28名年龄在18-45岁的久坐或娱乐活动的成年人(14名男性和14名女性)被随机分组,在自行车计力器上进行8周的HF或WW训练(分别为每周4次或2次),包括连续和间歇运动,强度和量在组间匹配。WW训练在提高v_o2max方面不逊于HF训练(平均值±标准差;WW: 43.5±6.5 vs 47.8±6.4 mL/kg/min;HF: 42.3±6.2 vs. 47.3±6.7;训练主效应p -1;HF: 0.036±0.011 vs. 0.041±0.010;训练的主要作用:p = 0.002),也不影响心肺、底物氧化、随意肌收缩和亚极限运动知觉反应的改善(所有结果的交互作用:p = 0.05)。8周的训练改善了v_o2max和广泛的生理结果,训练频率之间没有差异,这表明每周运动量的分布在短期训练中影响有限。试验注册:该试验在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,标识符:NCT05908578。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.90%
发文量
162
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports is a multidisciplinary journal published 12 times per year under the auspices of the Scandinavian Foundation of Medicine and Science in Sports. It aims to publish high quality and impactful articles in the fields of orthopaedics, rehabilitation and sports medicine, exercise physiology and biochemistry, biomechanics and motor control, health and disease relating to sport, exercise and physical activity, as well as on the social and behavioural aspects of sport and exercise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信