The association between polypharmacy and disease control in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: a cohort study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
William Berthelot, Caroline Sirois, Anne-Sophie Julien, Nathalie Amiable, Louis Bessette, Philippe Desaulniers, Marie-Claude Audet, Sonia Lagacé, Paul R Fortin
{"title":"The association between polypharmacy and disease control in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: a cohort study.","authors":"William Berthelot, Caroline Sirois, Anne-Sophie Julien, Nathalie Amiable, Louis Bessette, Philippe Desaulniers, Marie-Claude Audet, Sonia Lagacé, Paul R Fortin","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05804-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polypharmacy can be associated with poor outcomes in chronic diseases. Our objective is to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy and its association with disease control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). An observational study was conducted using the SARD database of the CHU de Québec. Participants newly diagnosed with RA or SLE enrolled in the database after 24 months were included. Collected data included number and type of medications, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and medication adherence (proportion of days covered during the first 180 days). Polypharmacy was defined as the simultaneous use ≥5 medications. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were used to determine the association between polypharmacy and disease control (DAS28CRP, SLEDAI-2 K). The study included 111 participants (RA = 81; SLE = 30). Medication count increased at two years in RA (mean ± SD): 4.6 ± 3.3 to 6.9 ± 3.6; and SLE: 6.5 ± 4.6 to 7.80 ± 4.82. Polypharmacy prevalence increased at two years: RA: from 43 to 74%; SLE: from 47 to 73%. Mean medication adherence exceeded 85%. For RA participants, polypharmacy was associated with a better DAS28CRP score at one year [adjusted odds ratio of achieving a poor outcome: 0.17 (95%CI 0.04-0.71)], but this association was lost at two years [2.88 (0.45-18.29)]. For SLE, polypharmacy was not associated with disease activity based on the SLEDAI-2 K at one year [7.36 (0.26-211.16)] or two years [0.32 (0.05-1.99)]. Overall, polypharmacy is very prevalent in RA and SLE and could be positively associated with the level of disease control in the year after a diagnosis of RA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 3","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05804-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polypharmacy can be associated with poor outcomes in chronic diseases. Our objective is to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy and its association with disease control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). An observational study was conducted using the SARD database of the CHU de Québec. Participants newly diagnosed with RA or SLE enrolled in the database after 24 months were included. Collected data included number and type of medications, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and medication adherence (proportion of days covered during the first 180 days). Polypharmacy was defined as the simultaneous use ≥5 medications. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were used to determine the association between polypharmacy and disease control (DAS28CRP, SLEDAI-2 K). The study included 111 participants (RA = 81; SLE = 30). Medication count increased at two years in RA (mean ± SD): 4.6 ± 3.3 to 6.9 ± 3.6; and SLE: 6.5 ± 4.6 to 7.80 ± 4.82. Polypharmacy prevalence increased at two years: RA: from 43 to 74%; SLE: from 47 to 73%. Mean medication adherence exceeded 85%. For RA participants, polypharmacy was associated with a better DAS28CRP score at one year [adjusted odds ratio of achieving a poor outcome: 0.17 (95%CI 0.04-0.71)], but this association was lost at two years [2.88 (0.45-18.29)]. For SLE, polypharmacy was not associated with disease activity based on the SLEDAI-2 K at one year [7.36 (0.26-211.16)] or two years [0.32 (0.05-1.99)]. Overall, polypharmacy is very prevalent in RA and SLE and could be positively associated with the level of disease control in the year after a diagnosis of RA.

类风湿关节炎和系统性红斑狼疮多药治疗与疾病控制的关系:一项队列研究
多种药物治疗可能与慢性疾病的不良预后有关。我们的目的是确定类风湿性关节炎(RA)和系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者多药的患病率及其与疾病控制的关系。利用中国科学院科学院的SARD数据库进行了一项观察性研究。新诊断为RA或SLE的参与者在24个月后被纳入数据库。收集的数据包括药物的数量和类型、Charlson合并症指数和药物依从性(前180天覆盖天数的比例)。多重用药定义为同时使用≥5种药物。采用多变量logistic和线性回归来确定多药治疗与疾病控制(DAS28CRP, SLEDAI-2 K)之间的关系。sle = 30)。RA患者用药次数2年增加(平均±SD): 4.6±3.3 ~ 6.9±3.6;SLE: 6.5±4.6 ~ 7.80±4.82。2年多药患病率增加:RA:从43%增加到74%;SLE:从47%到73%。平均药物依从性超过85%。对于RA参与者,多药治疗与一年后较好的DAS28CRP评分相关[获得不良结果的调整优势比:0.17 (95%CI 0.04-0.71)],但这种关联在两年后消失[2.88(0.45-18.29)]。对于SLE,基于SLEDAI-2 K,在1年[7.36(0.26-211.16)]或2年[0.32(0.05-1.99)]时,多药与疾病活动性无关。总的来说,多重用药在RA和SLE中非常普遍,并且可能与RA诊断后一年的疾病控制水平呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信