The impact of electronic cigarette use on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Chunyan Song , Xiaoning Hao , Elena Critselis , Demosthenes Panagiotakos
{"title":"The impact of electronic cigarette use on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Chunyan Song ,&nbsp;Xiaoning Hao ,&nbsp;Elena Critselis ,&nbsp;Demosthenes Panagiotakos","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Electronic cigarette (or e-cigarette) use is increasing globally. To date, there are limited pooled estimates regarding the impact of e-cigarette use on <em>chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)</em>. The present meta-analysis of large-scale population-based observational studies evaluates the impact of e-cigarette use on COPD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search of observational studies published between 1/2020-1/2024 was conducted in MEDLINE and Scopus based on PRISMA Guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 3670 originally retrieved papers, 7 observational studies (including 4 cross-sectional studies and 3 prospective cohort studies) fulfilled all search criteria and were used for the present meta-analysis which encompassed in total, 3,552,424 participants, including 138,698 cases with COPD. The findings from the random-effects meta-analysis (I<sup>2</sup> = 22 %, Cochran Q (6) = 7.19, p = 0.307) suggested that use of e-cigarette among non-cigarette users was associated with (pooled Relative Risk, pRR) 1.50-times higher likelihood of COPD (95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 1.27, 1.73). Sensitivity analysis by leave-one-out analysis confirmed the aforementioned results (range of pRR values: 1.46 to 1.61, all p &lt; 0.001). Stratified pooled effect estimates of cross-sectional studies only (pOR = 1.55, 95 % CI: 1.26, 1.84) and of prospective cohort studies only (pRR = 1.52, 95 % CI: 0.98–2.06), revealed that the e-cigarette users exhibit between 52 % and 55 % significantly higher likelihood of COPD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The current meta-analysis highlights that e-cigarette users face an increased risk of developing COPD. Therefore, public health interventions aimed at diminishing e-cigarette are necessary for preventing COPD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 107985"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611125000472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Electronic cigarette (or e-cigarette) use is increasing globally. To date, there are limited pooled estimates regarding the impact of e-cigarette use on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The present meta-analysis of large-scale population-based observational studies evaluates the impact of e-cigarette use on COPD.

Methods

A systematic search of observational studies published between 1/2020-1/2024 was conducted in MEDLINE and Scopus based on PRISMA Guidelines.

Results

Of 3670 originally retrieved papers, 7 observational studies (including 4 cross-sectional studies and 3 prospective cohort studies) fulfilled all search criteria and were used for the present meta-analysis which encompassed in total, 3,552,424 participants, including 138,698 cases with COPD. The findings from the random-effects meta-analysis (I2 = 22 %, Cochran Q (6) = 7.19, p = 0.307) suggested that use of e-cigarette among non-cigarette users was associated with (pooled Relative Risk, pRR) 1.50-times higher likelihood of COPD (95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 1.27, 1.73). Sensitivity analysis by leave-one-out analysis confirmed the aforementioned results (range of pRR values: 1.46 to 1.61, all p < 0.001). Stratified pooled effect estimates of cross-sectional studies only (pOR = 1.55, 95 % CI: 1.26, 1.84) and of prospective cohort studies only (pRR = 1.52, 95 % CI: 0.98–2.06), revealed that the e-cigarette users exhibit between 52 % and 55 % significantly higher likelihood of COPD.

Conclusions

The current meta-analysis highlights that e-cigarette users face an increased risk of developing COPD. Therefore, public health interventions aimed at diminishing e-cigarette are necessary for preventing COPD.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory medicine
Respiratory medicine 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants. Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信