Evaluation of interventions in prehospital and in-hospital settings and outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients meeting the termination of resuscitation rule in Japan: A nationwide database study (The JAAM-OHCA Registry)

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Tadaharu Shiozumi , Tasuku Matsuyama , Norihiro Nishioka , Takeyuki Kiguchi , Tetsuhisa Kitamura , Bon Ohta , Taku Iwami
{"title":"Evaluation of interventions in prehospital and in-hospital settings and outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients meeting the termination of resuscitation rule in Japan: A nationwide database study (The JAAM-OHCA Registry)","authors":"Tadaharu Shiozumi ,&nbsp;Tasuku Matsuyama ,&nbsp;Norihiro Nishioka ,&nbsp;Takeyuki Kiguchi ,&nbsp;Tetsuhisa Kitamura ,&nbsp;Bon Ohta ,&nbsp;Taku Iwami","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a global health burden with low survival rates. The termination of resuscitation (TOR) rule, widely adopted internationally, aims to preserve dignity, optimize resources, and protect healthcare providers. However, prehospital TOR is not implemented in Japan, presenting legal and practical challenges. This study analyzes temporal trends in prehospital and in-hospital interventions for OHCA patients with poor predicted outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study analyzed data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (JAAM-OHCA) registry (June 2014–December 2021). Adult OHCA patients with medical causes were included if they fulfilled all the advanced life support (ALS) TOR rule criteria: unwitnessed arrest, no return of spontaneous circulation, no bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and no automated external defibrillator use or defibrillation. Prehospital and in-hospital interventions were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 11,334 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 2,447 received all three ALS interventions (advanced airway management, intravenous access, and epinephrine administration). Over time, in-hospital interventions, including endotracheal intubation (56%) and epinephrine administration (82%), decreased, while advanced therapies, including coronary angiography, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and targeted temperature management, remained rare (&lt;1%). The median time to TOR after hospital arrival shortened to 18 min. In contrast, prehospital epinephrine administration increased, while advanced airway management and intravenous access decreased.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>OHCA patients who met TOR rule showed a decrease in in-hospital interventions. Further efforts are warranted to avoid futile medical treatments and promote patient-centered care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 110530"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300957225000425","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a global health burden with low survival rates. The termination of resuscitation (TOR) rule, widely adopted internationally, aims to preserve dignity, optimize resources, and protect healthcare providers. However, prehospital TOR is not implemented in Japan, presenting legal and practical challenges. This study analyzes temporal trends in prehospital and in-hospital interventions for OHCA patients with poor predicted outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (JAAM-OHCA) registry (June 2014–December 2021). Adult OHCA patients with medical causes were included if they fulfilled all the advanced life support (ALS) TOR rule criteria: unwitnessed arrest, no return of spontaneous circulation, no bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and no automated external defibrillator use or defibrillation. Prehospital and in-hospital interventions were evaluated.

Results

Among 11,334 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 2,447 received all three ALS interventions (advanced airway management, intravenous access, and epinephrine administration). Over time, in-hospital interventions, including endotracheal intubation (56%) and epinephrine administration (82%), decreased, while advanced therapies, including coronary angiography, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and targeted temperature management, remained rare (<1%). The median time to TOR after hospital arrival shortened to 18 min. In contrast, prehospital epinephrine administration increased, while advanced airway management and intravenous access decreased.

Conclusions

OHCA patients who met TOR rule showed a decrease in in-hospital interventions. Further efforts are warranted to avoid futile medical treatments and promote patient-centered care.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信