Maja Guberina , Martin Stuschke , Dirk Flühs , Leyla Jabbarli , Tobias Kiefer , Eva Biewald , Philipp Rating , Henning Manke , Sami Dalbah , Christian Hoffmann , Nika Guberina , Christoph Pöttgen , Miltiadis Fiorentzis , Andreas Foerster , Tobias Grunewald , Norbert Bornfeld , Wolfgang Sauerwein , Nikolaos Bechrakis , Ekaterina Sokolenko
{"title":"Dose response relation for optic nerve atrophy at low-dose rate brachytherapy of uveal melanoma","authors":"Maja Guberina , Martin Stuschke , Dirk Flühs , Leyla Jabbarli , Tobias Kiefer , Eva Biewald , Philipp Rating , Henning Manke , Sami Dalbah , Christian Hoffmann , Nika Guberina , Christoph Pöttgen , Miltiadis Fiorentzis , Andreas Foerster , Tobias Grunewald , Norbert Bornfeld , Wolfgang Sauerwein , Nikolaos Bechrakis , Ekaterina Sokolenko","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Dose-response relationships for optic neuropathy and optic nerve atrophy after brachytherapy for posterior uveal melanoma were poorly defined from previous studies. Here, the outcome differences were analyzed in dependence on dosimetric factors, the applicator type, and tumor dependent variables.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Primary objective was to evaluate the association of applied dose and on-set of optic nerve atrophy after brachytherapy for posterior uveal melanoma in order to allow risk estimation for new patients.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective study was performed at a single high volume centre for ocular oncology. Patients receiving brachytherapy with Ruthenium-106 applicators for posterior uveal melanoma with a maximum distance between optic nerve and the nearest tumor margin of 4 optical disc diameters and follow-up with fundus photographs were included. The dose distribution at the optic nerve was reconstructed from the fundus photographs at latest follow-up and the dose-distribution of the applicator using a dedicated software. A first mask with important structural elements such as optic nerve, macula, tumor and vessels was first superimposed on the fundus photograph and adapted to the real contours. In a second step, an applicator contour mask was adapted to the radiation scar in order to calculate the dose distribution in all structures. Dose-response relations were obtained by weighted logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The maximum dose at the optic disc (OD<sub>max</sub>) in this group of 109 patients ranged from 5.8 Gy – 242.2 Gy, median 48.7 Gy. Optic nerve atrophy was observed in 29<!--> <!-->patients. Median time to radiation induced optic nerve atrophy was 18<!--> <!-->months. Using weighted logistic regression, the dependence of optic nerve atrophy on OD<sub>max</sub> was significant (<em>p</em> = 0.0001, chi<sup>2</sup>-test). There was a considerable interobserver variability in OD<sub>max</sub> values (<em>p</em> < 0.02, signed rank test). An additional factor influencing the dose–response was the applicator type (<em>p</em> = 0.0315, chi<sup>2</sup>-test). The OD<sub>max</sub> for a probability of optic nerve atrophy of 50 % (ED50) were 77.6 Gy ± 7.0 Gy for patients treated with notched COB applicators and 53.2 Gy ± 8.2 Gy for patients with other applicators. Including the applicator type, the area under ROC curve reached a value of 0.857 (95 %-CI: 0.793–0.921) for the logistic model with OD<sub>max</sub>. The ED50 for optic nerve neuropathy, classified as grade ≥ 1 toxicity, was estimated to be 46.9 Gy ± 4.1 Gy for the maximum dose at the optic disc.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significant dose–response curves were found for optic nerve atrophy at low dose rate brachytherapy. A standard position of COB applicators was identified that allows estimation of the dose–response relation from the scleral dose of the applicator for risk estimation without fundus photographs. This larger data set enhances the knowledge of dose–response relationships for irradiation near the optic nerve.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 110775"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814025000702","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Dose-response relationships for optic neuropathy and optic nerve atrophy after brachytherapy for posterior uveal melanoma were poorly defined from previous studies. Here, the outcome differences were analyzed in dependence on dosimetric factors, the applicator type, and tumor dependent variables.
Purpose
Primary objective was to evaluate the association of applied dose and on-set of optic nerve atrophy after brachytherapy for posterior uveal melanoma in order to allow risk estimation for new patients.
Materials and methods
This retrospective study was performed at a single high volume centre for ocular oncology. Patients receiving brachytherapy with Ruthenium-106 applicators for posterior uveal melanoma with a maximum distance between optic nerve and the nearest tumor margin of 4 optical disc diameters and follow-up with fundus photographs were included. The dose distribution at the optic nerve was reconstructed from the fundus photographs at latest follow-up and the dose-distribution of the applicator using a dedicated software. A first mask with important structural elements such as optic nerve, macula, tumor and vessels was first superimposed on the fundus photograph and adapted to the real contours. In a second step, an applicator contour mask was adapted to the radiation scar in order to calculate the dose distribution in all structures. Dose-response relations were obtained by weighted logistic regression.
Results
The maximum dose at the optic disc (ODmax) in this group of 109 patients ranged from 5.8 Gy – 242.2 Gy, median 48.7 Gy. Optic nerve atrophy was observed in 29 patients. Median time to radiation induced optic nerve atrophy was 18 months. Using weighted logistic regression, the dependence of optic nerve atrophy on ODmax was significant (p = 0.0001, chi2-test). There was a considerable interobserver variability in ODmax values (p < 0.02, signed rank test). An additional factor influencing the dose–response was the applicator type (p = 0.0315, chi2-test). The ODmax for a probability of optic nerve atrophy of 50 % (ED50) were 77.6 Gy ± 7.0 Gy for patients treated with notched COB applicators and 53.2 Gy ± 8.2 Gy for patients with other applicators. Including the applicator type, the area under ROC curve reached a value of 0.857 (95 %-CI: 0.793–0.921) for the logistic model with ODmax. The ED50 for optic nerve neuropathy, classified as grade ≥ 1 toxicity, was estimated to be 46.9 Gy ± 4.1 Gy for the maximum dose at the optic disc.
Conclusions
Significant dose–response curves were found for optic nerve atrophy at low dose rate brachytherapy. A standard position of COB applicators was identified that allows estimation of the dose–response relation from the scleral dose of the applicator for risk estimation without fundus photographs. This larger data set enhances the knowledge of dose–response relationships for irradiation near the optic nerve.
期刊介绍:
Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.