Duplex Ultrasound in Evaluating Transplanted Renal Artery In-Stent Restenosis

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Fu-shun Pan MD, Dao-peng Yang MD, Rong-hai Deng MD
{"title":"Duplex Ultrasound in Evaluating Transplanted Renal Artery In-Stent Restenosis","authors":"Fu-shun Pan MD,&nbsp;Dao-peng Yang MD,&nbsp;Rong-hai Deng MD","doi":"10.1002/jum.16656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the diagnosis performance of duplex ultrasound (DUS) in predicting transplanted renal artery (TRA) in-stent restenosis (ISR).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this retrospective study, 112 consecutive patients underwent stenting due to TRA stenosis. DUS were performed within 1 week after stenting for baseline value, and after ≥3 months follow-up for surveillance of ISR. The DUS measurements included peak systolic velocity (PSV) and PSV ratio of renal artery stent to iliac artery (RIR). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to evaluate the diagnosis performance of DUS parameters in predicting ISR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 69 patients (28 men; age, 38.3 ± 15.1 years) who obtained 92 adequate paired DUS and CTA after stenting, which were classified as ISR group (26 TRAs) and non-ISR group (66 TRAs). There was no difference between the two groups for baseline DUS features, including PSV<sub>B</sub> and RIR<sub>B</sub>. The late DUS features including stent PSV<sub>L</sub> (475.5 vs 261.9 cm/s), RIR<sub>L</sub> (4.10 vs 2.18), and stent PSV<sub>L</sub>/PSV<sub>B</sub> (2.72 vs 1.14) were significantly higher in the ISR group than the non-ISR group (all <i>P</i> &lt; .0001). Stent PSV<sub>L</sub>, RIR<sub>L</sub>, and PSV<sub>L</sub>/PSV<sub>B</sub> demonstrated comparable AUCs in predicting ISR. However, the sensitivity and specificity of PSV<sub>L</sub>/PSV<sub>B</sub> in predicting ISR were 92.3 and 93.5%, respectively, demonstrating higher specificity with equivalent sensitivity than PSV<sub>L</sub> and higher sensitivity with equivalent specificity than RIR<sub>L</sub>.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>DUS is an accurate technique to identify TRA-ISR. We suggest all patients should undergo DUS immediately after stenting to establish baseline value and aid in evaluating ISR at late follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"44 6","pages":"971-980"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jum.16656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the diagnosis performance of duplex ultrasound (DUS) in predicting transplanted renal artery (TRA) in-stent restenosis (ISR).

Methods

In this retrospective study, 112 consecutive patients underwent stenting due to TRA stenosis. DUS were performed within 1 week after stenting for baseline value, and after ≥3 months follow-up for surveillance of ISR. The DUS measurements included peak systolic velocity (PSV) and PSV ratio of renal artery stent to iliac artery (RIR). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to evaluate the diagnosis performance of DUS parameters in predicting ISR.

Results

There were 69 patients (28 men; age, 38.3 ± 15.1 years) who obtained 92 adequate paired DUS and CTA after stenting, which were classified as ISR group (26 TRAs) and non-ISR group (66 TRAs). There was no difference between the two groups for baseline DUS features, including PSVB and RIRB. The late DUS features including stent PSVL (475.5 vs 261.9 cm/s), RIRL (4.10 vs 2.18), and stent PSVL/PSVB (2.72 vs 1.14) were significantly higher in the ISR group than the non-ISR group (all P < .0001). Stent PSVL, RIRL, and PSVL/PSVB demonstrated comparable AUCs in predicting ISR. However, the sensitivity and specificity of PSVL/PSVB in predicting ISR were 92.3 and 93.5%, respectively, demonstrating higher specificity with equivalent sensitivity than PSVL and higher sensitivity with equivalent specificity than RIRL.

Conclusions

DUS is an accurate technique to identify TRA-ISR. We suggest all patients should undergo DUS immediately after stenting to establish baseline value and aid in evaluating ISR at late follow-up.

双相超声评价移植肾动脉支架内再狭窄。
目的:评价双工超声(DUS)对移植肾动脉(TRA)支架内再狭窄(ISR)的诊断价值。方法:在本回顾性研究中,连续112例患者因TRA狭窄接受支架置入。DUS在支架植入后1周内进行基线值,并在随访≥3个月后进行ISR监测。DUS测量包括收缩峰值速度(PSV)和肾动脉支架与髂动脉的PSV比值(RIR)。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价DUS参数预测ISR的诊断效果。结果:69例患者(男性28例;年龄(38.3±15.1岁),支架置入术后获得足量配对DUS和CTA 92例,分为ISR组(26例)和非ISR组(66例)。两组的基线DUS特征无差异,包括PSVB和RIRB。晚期DUS特征包括支架PSVL (475.5 vs 261.9 cm/s)、RIRL (4.10 vs 2.18)和支架PSVL/PSVB (2.72 vs 1.14)在ISR组中显著高于非ISR组(所有的pl、RIRL和PSVL/PSVB在预测ISR方面具有相当的auc。而PSVL/PSVB预测ISR的敏感性和特异性分别为92.3和93.5%,特异度和等效灵敏度均高于PSVL,特异度和等效灵敏度均高于RIRL。结论:DUS是一种准确鉴别TRA-ISR的技术。我们建议所有患者在支架植入术后立即进行DUS,以建立基线值,并有助于在后期随访中评估ISR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信