Oral versus subcutaneous semaglutide weight loss outcomes after two years among patients with type 2 diabetes in a real-world database.

IF 2.7 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Jimmy Kwon, Diana Thiara, Jonathan H Watanabe
{"title":"Oral versus subcutaneous semaglutide weight loss outcomes after two years among patients with type 2 diabetes in a real-world database.","authors":"Jimmy Kwon, Diana Thiara, Jonathan H Watanabe","doi":"10.1080/17446651.2025.2462100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interest has grown in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor-agonist (GLP-1 RA) semaglutide long-term outcomes. This retrospective cohort study compared effectiveness of oral and subcutaneous semaglutide for weight loss outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) over a 2-year treatment period.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Weight loss was evaluated through mean percentage change from baseline, proportion achieving at least 5% weight loss and at least 10% weight loss comparing subcutaneous (<i>n</i> = 310) versus oral users (<i>n</i> = 57) and by age group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subcutaneous users experienced a mean percentage weight loss of 7.5% (16.7 pounds) with 58.7% and 32.9% achieving ≥5% and ≥10% loss, respectively. Oral users lost 4.4% (8.7 pounds) with 50.9% and 17.5% achieving ≥5% and ≥10% loss, respectively. Significant differences existed between formulations in mean percentage weight change (p-value <0.01) and proportion achieving ≥10% loss (p-value = 0.03), but not in proportion achieving ≥5% loss (p-value = 0.34). Outcomes differed by age within oral semaglutide (p-value = 0.02). Regression analyses adjusted for confounders yielded similar findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Subcutaneous users achieved superior weight loss compared to oral users. Older oral users experienced better weight loss compared to younger users. However, no differences were observed between subcutaneous users.</p>","PeriodicalId":12107,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17446651.2025.2462100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interest has grown in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor-agonist (GLP-1 RA) semaglutide long-term outcomes. This retrospective cohort study compared effectiveness of oral and subcutaneous semaglutide for weight loss outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) over a 2-year treatment period.

Research design and methods: Weight loss was evaluated through mean percentage change from baseline, proportion achieving at least 5% weight loss and at least 10% weight loss comparing subcutaneous (n = 310) versus oral users (n = 57) and by age group.

Results: Subcutaneous users experienced a mean percentage weight loss of 7.5% (16.7 pounds) with 58.7% and 32.9% achieving ≥5% and ≥10% loss, respectively. Oral users lost 4.4% (8.7 pounds) with 50.9% and 17.5% achieving ≥5% and ≥10% loss, respectively. Significant differences existed between formulations in mean percentage weight change (p-value <0.01) and proportion achieving ≥10% loss (p-value = 0.03), but not in proportion achieving ≥5% loss (p-value = 0.34). Outcomes differed by age within oral semaglutide (p-value = 0.02). Regression analyses adjusted for confounders yielded similar findings.

Conclusion: Subcutaneous users achieved superior weight loss compared to oral users. Older oral users experienced better weight loss compared to younger users. However, no differences were observed between subcutaneous users.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism
Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Implicated in a plethora of regulatory dysfunctions involving growth and development, metabolism, electrolyte balances and reproduction, endocrine disruption is one of the highest priority research topics in the world. As a result, we are now in a position to better detect, characterize and overcome the damage mediated by adverse interaction with the endocrine system. Expert Review of Endocrinology and Metabolism (ISSN 1744-6651), provides extensive coverage of state-of-the-art research and clinical advancements in the field of endocrine control and metabolism, with a focus on screening, prevention, diagnostics, existing and novel therapeutics, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信