Krishnan R Patel, Daniel E Spratt, Phouc T Tran, Daniel J Krauss, Anthony V D'Amico, Paul L Nguyen
{"title":"The Benefit of Short-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy with Radiotherapy for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Krishnan R Patel, Daniel E Spratt, Phouc T Tran, Daniel J Krauss, Anthony V D'Amico, Paul L Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.01.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A previous, individual patient-level meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated the overall survival (OS) benefit of short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ST-ADT) when delivered with radiotherapy for the subset of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa). However, due to inclusion criteria, several studies such as NRG/RTOG 0815, GETUG-14, and DFCI 95-096 were excluded. Thus, we conduct the present analysis, inclusive of all studies to define the current role for ST-ADT in IR-PCa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted of phase III RCTs published or presented between 1/1980 and 10/2024 which profiled the comparative efficacy of radiotherapy ± ST-ADT in patients with IR-PCa. A study-level, random-effects meta-analysis was performed. The primary endpoint of this meta-analysis was OS, with secondary endpoints of time-to-biochemical failure (BF) ± biochemical-progress-free survival (bPFS). Meta-regression was utilized to explore trial-level factors associated with treatment effects. Synthetic individual patient-level OS data was pooled for confirmation and used to estimate the relative and absolute survival benefit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs (NRG/RTOG 9408, DFCI 95-096, TROG 96.01, PCS III, EORTC 22991, NRG/RTOG 0815, and GETUG-14) reporting outcomes of 6,279 patients were identified. The pooled HR<sub>OS</sub>, HR<sub>BF</sub>, and HR<sub>BF+bPFS</sub> were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-0.97; p = 0.01), 0.50 (95% CI: 0.37-0.68; p<0.001), and 0.54 (95% CI: 0.46-0.65; p<0.001), respectively. ST-ADT duration, RT dose, and Gleason score trial population composition were each associated with an increased benefit of ST-ADT for biochemical disease control (all p<0.05) but not for OS (all p>0.05). Pooling of simulated, patient-level data confirmed the presence of a survival benefit (HR<sub>OS</sub>: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.76-0.96], log-rank p = 0.021), corresponding to an absolute survival benefit of 5% benefit at 10 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present analysis confirms current knowledge that ST-ADT improves both OS and PSA-based outcomes for unselected patients with IR-PCa to a clinically significant degree.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.01.022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: A previous, individual patient-level meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated the overall survival (OS) benefit of short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ST-ADT) when delivered with radiotherapy for the subset of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa). However, due to inclusion criteria, several studies such as NRG/RTOG 0815, GETUG-14, and DFCI 95-096 were excluded. Thus, we conduct the present analysis, inclusive of all studies to define the current role for ST-ADT in IR-PCa.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted of phase III RCTs published or presented between 1/1980 and 10/2024 which profiled the comparative efficacy of radiotherapy ± ST-ADT in patients with IR-PCa. A study-level, random-effects meta-analysis was performed. The primary endpoint of this meta-analysis was OS, with secondary endpoints of time-to-biochemical failure (BF) ± biochemical-progress-free survival (bPFS). Meta-regression was utilized to explore trial-level factors associated with treatment effects. Synthetic individual patient-level OS data was pooled for confirmation and used to estimate the relative and absolute survival benefit.
Results: Seven RCTs (NRG/RTOG 9408, DFCI 95-096, TROG 96.01, PCS III, EORTC 22991, NRG/RTOG 0815, and GETUG-14) reporting outcomes of 6,279 patients were identified. The pooled HROS, HRBF, and HRBF+bPFS were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-0.97; p = 0.01), 0.50 (95% CI: 0.37-0.68; p<0.001), and 0.54 (95% CI: 0.46-0.65; p<0.001), respectively. ST-ADT duration, RT dose, and Gleason score trial population composition were each associated with an increased benefit of ST-ADT for biochemical disease control (all p<0.05) but not for OS (all p>0.05). Pooling of simulated, patient-level data confirmed the presence of a survival benefit (HROS: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.76-0.96], log-rank p = 0.021), corresponding to an absolute survival benefit of 5% benefit at 10 years.
Conclusion: The present analysis confirms current knowledge that ST-ADT improves both OS and PSA-based outcomes for unselected patients with IR-PCa to a clinically significant degree.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.