Comparative efficacy of acupuncture therapies in premature ovarian failure: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

IF 3.3 3区医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE

Complementary therapies in medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103141

Yonghang Yi, Fengjun Ma, Yang Jiao, Rongqi Zhang, Yunhao Yi, Yuxia Ma

{"title":"Comparative efficacy of acupuncture therapies in premature ovarian failure: A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Yonghang Yi, Fengjun Ma, Yang Jiao, Rongqi Zhang, Yunhao Yi, Yuxia Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Premature ovarian failure (POF) is becoming more common and has a major negative impact on women's mental and physical well-being. The use of acupuncture therapies to treat POF has gained popularity. However, the optimal treatment remains uncertain. This study aimed to systematically review the literature and conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of different acupuncture and related therapies and identify methodologic weaknesses in previous studies.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We systematically searched six databases from their inception to April 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture therapies for POF. We assessed methodological quality and risk of bias using the RoB 2.0 tool. The NMA was conducted using R and STATA software based on frequency theory, focusing on overall effectiveness rates and hormone levels. Additionally, we critically reviewed methodological limitations and potential biases in the studies included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-seven eligible studies involving 2419 patients were included in this NMA. The NMA results indicated that moxibustion_catgut implantation at acupoint (MB_CIA) (P-score = 0.88; pooled mean difference (95 % CI): 22.07 (1.61–302.48)) showed the highest improvement in overall effectiveness, while warming acupuncture (WA) (0.95; −27.56 (-45.35 to −9.78)) improved follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels best. WA_MB (0.85; −9.35 (-15.08 to −3.62)) and WA (P-score = 0.77) were most effective for luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol (E2) levels, respectively. Confidence in evidence ranged from moderate to very low, with low overall confidence. Key methodologic weaknesses included insufficient allocation concealment, lack of blinding, and small sample sizes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Acupuncture therapies may effectively improve POF. MB_CIA, WA, and WA_MB seem to be the most effective. However, severe methodological constraints, such as insufficient randomization and a lack of blinding, may reduce trust in these results. To offer robust evidence, high-quality RCTs must overcome these limitations.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review registration</h3><div>[PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42024550180].</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10545,"journal":{"name":"Complementary therapies in medicine","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 103141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary therapies in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229925000160","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Premature ovarian failure (POF) is becoming more common and has a major negative impact on women's mental and physical well-being. The use of acupuncture therapies to treat POF has gained popularity. However, the optimal treatment remains uncertain. This study aimed to systematically review the literature and conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of different acupuncture and related therapies and identify methodologic weaknesses in previous studies.

Design

We systematically searched six databases from their inception to April 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture therapies for POF. We assessed methodological quality and risk of bias using the RoB 2.0 tool. The NMA was conducted using R and STATA software based on frequency theory, focusing on overall effectiveness rates and hormone levels. Additionally, we critically reviewed methodological limitations and potential biases in the studies included.

Results

Thirty-seven eligible studies involving 2419 patients were included in this NMA. The NMA results indicated that moxibustion_catgut implantation at acupoint (MB_CIA) (P-score = 0.88; pooled mean difference (95 % CI): 22.07 (1.61–302.48)) showed the highest improvement in overall effectiveness, while warming acupuncture (WA) (0.95; −27.56 (-45.35 to −9.78)) improved follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels best. WA_MB (0.85; −9.35 (-15.08 to −3.62)) and WA (P-score = 0.77) were most effective for luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol (E2) levels, respectively. Confidence in evidence ranged from moderate to very low, with low overall confidence. Key methodologic weaknesses included insufficient allocation concealment, lack of blinding, and small sample sizes.

Conclusions

Acupuncture therapies may effectively improve POF. MB_CIA, WA, and WA_MB seem to be the most effective. However, severe methodological constraints, such as insufficient randomization and a lack of blinding, may reduce trust in these results. To offer robust evidence, high-quality RCTs must overcome these limitations.

Systematic review registration

[PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42024550180].

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Complementary therapies in medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学

CiteScore

8.60

自引率

2.80%

发文量

101

审稿时长

112 days

期刊介绍： Complementary Therapies in Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal that has considerable appeal to anyone who seeks objective and critical information on complementary therapies or who wishes to deepen their understanding of these approaches. It will be of particular interest to healthcare practitioners including family practitioners, complementary therapists, nurses, and physiotherapists; to academics including social scientists and CAM researchers; to healthcare managers; and to patients. Complementary Therapies in Medicine aims to publish valid, relevant and rigorous research and serious discussion articles with the main purpose of improving healthcare.