Insights into adverse events and safety profile of upadacitinib in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Bruna Thaytala Quintino Falcon, Tamires de Mello Guimaraes, Gabriele Alves Halpern, Cintia Gomes, Taisa de Mello Guimaraes
{"title":"Insights into adverse events and safety profile of upadacitinib in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Bruna Thaytala Quintino Falcon, Tamires de Mello Guimaraes, Gabriele Alves Halpern, Cintia Gomes, Taisa de Mello Guimaraes","doi":"10.1007/s12664-024-01720-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with upadacitinib and examined secondary adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing upadacitinib with placebo in adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The primary outcome was the incidence of SAEs, while secondary outcomes included specific adverse events. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs, including 2611 patients, were analyzed. The incidence of SAEs did not significantly differ between upadacitinib (6.1%) and placebo (7%) (RR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.50-1.20; p = 0.25). Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences in serious infections, hepatic disorders, nasopharyngitis or herpes zoster. However, neutropenia (RR = 5.63; 95% CI: 1.90-16.65; p = 0.0002) and creatine kinase elevation (RR = 2.34; 95% CI: 1.22-4.47; p = 0.01) were higher with upadacitinib, while anemia (RR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.27-0.48; p < 0.00001) and arthralgia (RR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.30-0.75; p = 0.001) were reduced.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upadacitinib did not increase the overall risk of SAEs in IBD patients, with a notable reduction in anemia and arthralgia. However, the higher risks of neutropenia and CK elevation underscore the importance of monitoring. Further research is necessary to assess long-term safety, particularly regarding rare but serious events such as thromboembolism.</p>","PeriodicalId":13404,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-024-01720-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with upadacitinib and examined secondary adverse events.
Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing upadacitinib with placebo in adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The primary outcome was the incidence of SAEs, while secondary outcomes included specific adverse events. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.
Results: Six RCTs, including 2611 patients, were analyzed. The incidence of SAEs did not significantly differ between upadacitinib (6.1%) and placebo (7%) (RR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.50-1.20; p = 0.25). Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences in serious infections, hepatic disorders, nasopharyngitis or herpes zoster. However, neutropenia (RR = 5.63; 95% CI: 1.90-16.65; p = 0.0002) and creatine kinase elevation (RR = 2.34; 95% CI: 1.22-4.47; p = 0.01) were higher with upadacitinib, while anemia (RR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.27-0.48; p < 0.00001) and arthralgia (RR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.30-0.75; p = 0.001) were reduced.
Conclusion: Upadacitinib did not increase the overall risk of SAEs in IBD patients, with a notable reduction in anemia and arthralgia. However, the higher risks of neutropenia and CK elevation underscore the importance of monitoring. Further research is necessary to assess long-term safety, particularly regarding rare but serious events such as thromboembolism.
期刊介绍:
The Indian Journal of Gastroenterology aims to help doctors everywhere practise better medicine and to influence the debate on gastroenterology. To achieve these aims, we publish original scientific studies, state-of -the-art special articles, reports and papers commenting on the clinical, scientific and public health factors affecting aspects of gastroenterology. We shall be delighted to receive articles for publication in all of these categories and letters commenting on the contents of the Journal or on issues of interest to our readers.