The effect of noise on listening effort in children as measured using different methods: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Gudambe Nellithaya Spoorthi, Ajith Kumar Uppunda, Mohan Kumar Kalaiah, Usha Shastri
{"title":"The effect of noise on listening effort in children as measured using different methods: a systematic review and meta-analyses.","authors":"Gudambe Nellithaya Spoorthi, Ajith Kumar Uppunda, Mohan Kumar Kalaiah, Usha Shastri","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09232-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Listening effort increases as background noise levels rise, affecting both children and adults. Understanding the impact of increased listening effort and identifying effective methods to estimate it in children is crucial, as higher listening effort can hinder learning. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effects of noise on listening effort, as measured using various methods, in children aged 5 to 13 years with normal hearing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four scientific databases, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were searched to retrieve 23 eligible articles. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies. Meta-analysis was performed according to different methods of listening effort [behavioral (single-task paradigm and dual-task paradigm), subjective ratings, and physiological (pupillometry)].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Single-task paradigm and subjective ratings showed a medium effect of noise on listening effort, which was significant. Dual-task paradigm and pupillometry did not show statistically significant effects of noise on listening effort. Further, speech perception tasks show a greater effect of noise on listening effort as compared to listening comprehension.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single-task paradigm and subjective rating methods revealed the negative effect of noise on listening effort during spoken language processing in children between 5-13 years of age. Thus, a combination of these two methods might provide useful information regarding the effect of noise on this population. The heterogeneity in the findings could be due to the multidimensional nature of listening effort and lack of construct validity of the methods used to assess listening effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09232-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Listening effort increases as background noise levels rise, affecting both children and adults. Understanding the impact of increased listening effort and identifying effective methods to estimate it in children is crucial, as higher listening effort can hinder learning. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effects of noise on listening effort, as measured using various methods, in children aged 5 to 13 years with normal hearing.

Methods: Four scientific databases, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were searched to retrieve 23 eligible articles. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies. Meta-analysis was performed according to different methods of listening effort [behavioral (single-task paradigm and dual-task paradigm), subjective ratings, and physiological (pupillometry)].

Results: Single-task paradigm and subjective ratings showed a medium effect of noise on listening effort, which was significant. Dual-task paradigm and pupillometry did not show statistically significant effects of noise on listening effort. Further, speech perception tasks show a greater effect of noise on listening effort as compared to listening comprehension.

Conclusions: Single-task paradigm and subjective rating methods revealed the negative effect of noise on listening effort during spoken language processing in children between 5-13 years of age. Thus, a combination of these two methods might provide useful information regarding the effect of noise on this population. The heterogeneity in the findings could be due to the multidimensional nature of listening effort and lack of construct validity of the methods used to assess listening effort.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信