Andrey V Golovin, Sergey Panteleev, Alexander S Zlobin, Nadia Anikeeva, Ivan Smirnov, Alexander Gabibov, Yuri Sykulev
{"title":"The role of peptide conformation presented by MHC in the induction of TCR triggering.","authors":"Andrey V Golovin, Sergey Panteleev, Alexander S Zlobin, Nadia Anikeeva, Ivan Smirnov, Alexander Gabibov, Yuri Sykulev","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2025.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High resolution crystal structure of stimulatory peptide-MHC (pMHC) ligands bound to TCR revealed different conformation of the two peptides at positions P6 and V7 compared to the conformation of the same peptides presented by unliganded MHC. Supercomputer simulation and well-tempered metadynamics approach revealed several meta-stable non-canonical TCR-pMHC interactions that depend on the conformation of the MHC-bound peptides. The diversity of meta-stable states was significantly more represented in signaling TCR-pMHC complex. These findings suggest that TCR-pMHC recognition can be informed by a conformation of peptide presented by MHC that notably influences the orientation of TCR recognizing pMHC ligand. It appears that TCR bound to stimulatory pMHC possess a significantly higher degree of freedom to assume various metastable TCR orientations which are distinct from canonical docking. In contrast, TCR interacting with non-stimulatory pMHC ligand revealed markedly less meta-stable non-canonical interactions and disengaged from the pMHC. This suggests that productive TCR-mediated signaling may depend on non-canonical interactions between TCR and pMHC, either facilitating early recognition events or providing new contacts for catch-bond formation. Our discovery can inform future attempts to simulate the catch-bond formation mechanism in TCR-pMHC recognition, allowing the formation of new bonds mediating alternative peptide presentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.02.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
High resolution crystal structure of stimulatory peptide-MHC (pMHC) ligands bound to TCR revealed different conformation of the two peptides at positions P6 and V7 compared to the conformation of the same peptides presented by unliganded MHC. Supercomputer simulation and well-tempered metadynamics approach revealed several meta-stable non-canonical TCR-pMHC interactions that depend on the conformation of the MHC-bound peptides. The diversity of meta-stable states was significantly more represented in signaling TCR-pMHC complex. These findings suggest that TCR-pMHC recognition can be informed by a conformation of peptide presented by MHC that notably influences the orientation of TCR recognizing pMHC ligand. It appears that TCR bound to stimulatory pMHC possess a significantly higher degree of freedom to assume various metastable TCR orientations which are distinct from canonical docking. In contrast, TCR interacting with non-stimulatory pMHC ligand revealed markedly less meta-stable non-canonical interactions and disengaged from the pMHC. This suggests that productive TCR-mediated signaling may depend on non-canonical interactions between TCR and pMHC, either facilitating early recognition events or providing new contacts for catch-bond formation. Our discovery can inform future attempts to simulate the catch-bond formation mechanism in TCR-pMHC recognition, allowing the formation of new bonds mediating alternative peptide presentation.
期刊介绍:
BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.