Interrater Reliability of the AM-PAC 6-Clicks Basic Mobility Short Form Between Nurses and Physical Therapists.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Nicholas J Williams, Stephanie Liebert, Yadi Li, Kim Kalo, Brittany Lapin, Joshua K Johnson
{"title":"Interrater Reliability of the AM-PAC 6-Clicks Basic Mobility Short Form Between Nurses and Physical Therapists.","authors":"Nicholas J Williams, Stephanie Liebert, Yadi Li, Kim Kalo, Brittany Lapin, Joshua K Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the interrater reliability between nurse- and physical therapist (PT)-recorded scores from the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care 6-Clicks Basic Mobility short form across hospitals, services, and categories of assessment timing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study of retrospective electronic health record data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data were collected for patients in 11 hospitals between January 2020 and October 2022. Nurse- and PT-recorded 6-Clicks mobility scores were paired by date.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>There were 535,974 unique score pairs for 127,583 patients.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome: </strong>Interrater reliability was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients where values <0.5, 0.5-0.75, 0.75-0.9, and >0.9 indicate poor, moderate, good, and excellent reliability, respectively. In secondary analyses, score pairs were categorized according to: (1) hospital, (2) unit type (intensive care vs other), (3) clinical service, and (4) relative timing of nurse- and PT-recorded scores.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>6-Clicks Basic Mobility short form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interrater reliability was good overall, in 6 hospitals (moderate in 4 hospitals and poor in 1), in both intensive care and other units, for 4 out of 5 clinical services (moderate for 1), and for 4 out of 5 timing categories (moderate for 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large study of real-world data, nurse- and PT-recorded 6-Clicks mobility scores had moderate-to-good interrater reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.472","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the interrater reliability between nurse- and physical therapist (PT)-recorded scores from the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care 6-Clicks Basic Mobility short form across hospitals, services, and categories of assessment timing.

Design: Cross-sectional study of retrospective electronic health record data.

Setting: Data were collected for patients in 11 hospitals between January 2020 and October 2022. Nurse- and PT-recorded 6-Clicks mobility scores were paired by date.

Participants: There were 535,974 unique score pairs for 127,583 patients.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome: Interrater reliability was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients where values <0.5, 0.5-0.75, 0.75-0.9, and >0.9 indicate poor, moderate, good, and excellent reliability, respectively. In secondary analyses, score pairs were categorized according to: (1) hospital, (2) unit type (intensive care vs other), (3) clinical service, and (4) relative timing of nurse- and PT-recorded scores.

Measures: 6-Clicks Basic Mobility short form.

Results: The interrater reliability was good overall, in 6 hospitals (moderate in 4 hospitals and poor in 1), in both intensive care and other units, for 4 out of 5 clinical services (moderate for 1), and for 4 out of 5 timing categories (moderate for 1).

Conclusions: In this large study of real-world data, nurse- and PT-recorded 6-Clicks mobility scores had moderate-to-good interrater reliability.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信