Understanding emotion dysregulation in PTSD – GAD comorbidity

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Lucy J. Allbaugh , Lucas Marinack , Alison M. Pickover , Abigail Powers , Erica D. Marshall Lee , Marylène Cloitre , Nadine J. Kaslow
{"title":"Understanding emotion dysregulation in PTSD – GAD comorbidity","authors":"Lucy J. Allbaugh ,&nbsp;Lucas Marinack ,&nbsp;Alison M. Pickover ,&nbsp;Abigail Powers ,&nbsp;Erica D. Marshall Lee ,&nbsp;Marylène Cloitre ,&nbsp;Nadine J. Kaslow","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.102985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) frequently co-occurs with myriad mood and anxiety disorders including generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Despite this comorbidity’s prevalence, mechanisms underlying the co-occurrence of PTSD and GAD remains understudied. An emotion dysregulation framework routinely is used to understand both PTSD and GAD but has not been applied to the PTSD-GAD comorbidity. Using MANOVA, the present study tested domains of emotion dysregulation (DERS) and of positive emotion regulation (AEQ) as differentiators of PTSD alone versus PTSD with GAD using pre-intervention data from a randomized controlled trial including 292 women with PTSD secondary to interpersonal violence. Five of six emotion dysregulation domains differentiated the two groups: fewer regulation strategies, nonacceptance of emotional responses, impulse control difficulties, lack of emotional awareness, and lack of emotional clarity were associated with comorbidity. Of three positive emotion regulation domains, participants with PTSD alone reported more positive emotionality than those with PTSD and GAD, and those with comorbid PTSD and GAD reported more negative affective interference than those with PTSD only. Rather than specific domains underlying unique presentations, findings indicate a general dysregulation factor, where PTSD-GAD comorbidity is supported by an overall higher level of emotion dysregulation as compared to PTSD alone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 102985"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618525000210","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) frequently co-occurs with myriad mood and anxiety disorders including generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Despite this comorbidity’s prevalence, mechanisms underlying the co-occurrence of PTSD and GAD remains understudied. An emotion dysregulation framework routinely is used to understand both PTSD and GAD but has not been applied to the PTSD-GAD comorbidity. Using MANOVA, the present study tested domains of emotion dysregulation (DERS) and of positive emotion regulation (AEQ) as differentiators of PTSD alone versus PTSD with GAD using pre-intervention data from a randomized controlled trial including 292 women with PTSD secondary to interpersonal violence. Five of six emotion dysregulation domains differentiated the two groups: fewer regulation strategies, nonacceptance of emotional responses, impulse control difficulties, lack of emotional awareness, and lack of emotional clarity were associated with comorbidity. Of three positive emotion regulation domains, participants with PTSD alone reported more positive emotionality than those with PTSD and GAD, and those with comorbid PTSD and GAD reported more negative affective interference than those with PTSD only. Rather than specific domains underlying unique presentations, findings indicate a general dysregulation factor, where PTSD-GAD comorbidity is supported by an overall higher level of emotion dysregulation as compared to PTSD alone.
了解PTSD - GAD合并症中的情绪失调
创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)经常与包括广泛性焦虑症(GAD)在内的多种情绪和焦虑障碍共同发生。尽管这种共病普遍存在,但PTSD和广泛性焦虑症共存的机制仍未得到充分研究。情绪失调框架通常用于理解PTSD和GAD,但尚未应用于PTSD-GAD合并症。本研究利用随机对照试验的干预前数据,利用多元方差分析(MANOVA)测试了情绪失调(DERS)和积极情绪调节(AEQ)作为单独PTSD与创伤后应激障碍合并广泛性焦虑症的区分因素,该试验包括292名女性PTSD继发于人际暴力。六个情绪失调领域中的五个区分了两组:较少的调节策略,不接受情绪反应,冲动控制困难,缺乏情绪意识,缺乏情绪清晰度与合并症有关。在三个积极情绪调节领域中,单独患有PTSD的参与者比PTSD和GAD的参与者报告了更多的积极情绪,而合并PTSD和GAD的参与者报告了更多的消极情绪干扰。研究结果表明,与单独的创伤后应激障碍相比,PTSD- gad共病的整体情绪失调水平更高,而不是特定领域的独特表现,这表明了一种普遍的失调因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信