Quantification of visual acuity: “Counting fingers” and “Hand movement” with the Berkeley Rudimentary Vision Test

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Alba Herrero , Halima Berrada , Rafael I. Barraquer , Ralph Michael
{"title":"Quantification of visual acuity: “Counting fingers” and “Hand movement” with the Berkeley Rudimentary Vision Test","authors":"Alba Herrero ,&nbsp;Halima Berrada ,&nbsp;Rafael I. Barraquer ,&nbsp;Ralph Michael","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2024.100531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aims to compare the results of the Finger Count Test (FCT) for “Counting fingers” (CF) and “Hand movement” (HM) with the visual acuity (VA) obtained from the Berkeley Rudimentary Vision Test (BRVT) in low vision patients with different pathologies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Uncorrected visual acuity was estimated using BRVT and using the corresponding CF or HM in 38 low vision patients (VA range between 1.40 and 3.50 logMAR). Detailed ocular pathologies were recorded for each patient. Patients were categorized into two groups: one with severe visual field defects (constrictions of the central visual field or central scotomas) due to any cause and a general group which included all other ocular pathologies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean age was 67 years, with an age range from 26 to 92 years. The General group revealed a median VA of 2.00 logMAR for CF and 2.60 logMAR for HM (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). This study showed a large variation of VA from BRVT in the Visual field group and considerable overlap with the VA results for CF and HM; with a median VA of 2.10 logMAR for CF and 2.30 logMAR for HM (<em>p</em> = 0.824).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The VA found in this study for CF confirmed values from earlier studies, while VA for HM was found to be slightly worse. These findings allow a translation of older VA data of CF and HM to logMAR for proper statistical analysis. Patients with central visual field defects showed a large variation of measured VA with BRVT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"18 1","pages":"Article 100531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429624000190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to compare the results of the Finger Count Test (FCT) for “Counting fingers” (CF) and “Hand movement” (HM) with the visual acuity (VA) obtained from the Berkeley Rudimentary Vision Test (BRVT) in low vision patients with different pathologies.

Methods

Uncorrected visual acuity was estimated using BRVT and using the corresponding CF or HM in 38 low vision patients (VA range between 1.40 and 3.50 logMAR). Detailed ocular pathologies were recorded for each patient. Patients were categorized into two groups: one with severe visual field defects (constrictions of the central visual field or central scotomas) due to any cause and a general group which included all other ocular pathologies.

Results

The mean age was 67 years, with an age range from 26 to 92 years. The General group revealed a median VA of 2.00 logMAR for CF and 2.60 logMAR for HM (p < 0.001). This study showed a large variation of VA from BRVT in the Visual field group and considerable overlap with the VA results for CF and HM; with a median VA of 2.10 logMAR for CF and 2.30 logMAR for HM (p = 0.824).

Conclusion

The VA found in this study for CF confirmed values from earlier studies, while VA for HM was found to be slightly worse. These findings allow a translation of older VA data of CF and HM to logMAR for proper statistical analysis. Patients with central visual field defects showed a large variation of measured VA with BRVT.
视觉敏锐度的量化:“数手指”和“手的运动”与伯克利基本视觉测验
目的比较不同病理低视力患者“数指”(CF)和“手部运动”(HM)的手指计数测验(FCT)结果与伯克利基本视力测验(BRVT)的视力(VA)结果。方法对38例低视力患者(VA范围在1.40 ~ 3.50 logMAR之间)采用BRVT和相应的CF或HM进行矫正视力评估。详细记录每位患者的眼部病理。患者被分为两组:一组是由于任何原因导致的严重视野缺陷(中央视野狭窄或中心暗斑),另一组是包括所有其他眼部病变的普通组。结果患者平均年龄67岁,年龄26 ~ 92岁。普通组显示CF的中位VA为2.00 logMAR, HM为2.60 logMAR (p <;0.001)。该研究显示,视野组的VA与BRVT有很大差异,与CF和HM的VA结果有相当大的重叠;CF的中位VA为2.10 logMAR, HM为2.30 logMAR (p = 0.824)。结论本研究中CF的VA值证实了早期研究的值,而HM的VA值稍差。这些发现允许将CF和HM的旧VA数据转换为logMAR进行适当的统计分析。中心视野缺损患者在BRVT中测量的VA差异较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信