Expanded applications of knotless tissue control devices in neurosurgical cranial and spinal applications

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Samuel A. Tenhoeve , Clayton Rawson , Dora R. Tabachnick , Mohammed A. Azab , Omowumi Oladipo , Michael Karsy
{"title":"Expanded applications of knotless tissue control devices in neurosurgical cranial and spinal applications","authors":"Samuel A. Tenhoeve ,&nbsp;Clayton Rawson ,&nbsp;Dora R. Tabachnick ,&nbsp;Mohammed A. Azab ,&nbsp;Omowumi Oladipo ,&nbsp;Michael Karsy","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Effective wound closure is essential to neurosurgical procedures. Historical rates of neurosurgical wound complications range from 7 to 14 %. Knotless suturing with barbed sutures may offer effective closure rates but has had limited evaluation of safety in neurosurgical applications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive patients undergoing cranial, spinal, and peripheral nerve neurosurgical procedures from 12/2022 until 7/2024 were included in a quality improvement initiative. A retrospective review of demographics, past medical history, and operative and postoperative variables was undertaken. The primary outcome of interest was wound complications, including surgical site infection (SSI), dehiscence, or CSF leak. A cost analysis of suture treatment was also compared. A comparison to historical control rates (7%) was performed (one-sample proportional z-test).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 195 consecutive patients were identified, with 10 wound-related complications including 3 superficial dehiscence treated with washout, 2 pseudomeningoceles, 2 cerebrospinal fluid leaks with meningitis, and 1 each of deep dehiscence with washout, superficial dehiscence with antibiotics, and epidural hematoma. A total of 53 (27.2 %) underwent cranial, 140 (71.8 %) spine, and 3 (1.0 %) peripheral nerve procedures. Ten patients (5.1 %) had incision complications with no difference to historical controls (p = 0.3). Cost analysis showed a range 0.35–3.03X cost differences using the knotless suture technique for different neurosurgical applications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Knotless suture techniques can be an effective closure method for a variety of neurosurgical techniques comparable to expected wound complication rates. We expand on the potential applications of this technology compared with prior studies. Further studies will be necessary to confirm these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 111108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825000803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Effective wound closure is essential to neurosurgical procedures. Historical rates of neurosurgical wound complications range from 7 to 14 %. Knotless suturing with barbed sutures may offer effective closure rates but has had limited evaluation of safety in neurosurgical applications.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing cranial, spinal, and peripheral nerve neurosurgical procedures from 12/2022 until 7/2024 were included in a quality improvement initiative. A retrospective review of demographics, past medical history, and operative and postoperative variables was undertaken. The primary outcome of interest was wound complications, including surgical site infection (SSI), dehiscence, or CSF leak. A cost analysis of suture treatment was also compared. A comparison to historical control rates (7%) was performed (one-sample proportional z-test).

Results

A total of 195 consecutive patients were identified, with 10 wound-related complications including 3 superficial dehiscence treated with washout, 2 pseudomeningoceles, 2 cerebrospinal fluid leaks with meningitis, and 1 each of deep dehiscence with washout, superficial dehiscence with antibiotics, and epidural hematoma. A total of 53 (27.2 %) underwent cranial, 140 (71.8 %) spine, and 3 (1.0 %) peripheral nerve procedures. Ten patients (5.1 %) had incision complications with no difference to historical controls (p = 0.3). Cost analysis showed a range 0.35–3.03X cost differences using the knotless suture technique for different neurosurgical applications.

Conclusion

Knotless suture techniques can be an effective closure method for a variety of neurosurgical techniques comparable to expected wound complication rates. We expand on the potential applications of this technology compared with prior studies. Further studies will be necessary to confirm these findings.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信