Home delivery vs. out-of-home delivery: Syncretic value-based strategies for urban last-mile e-commerce logistics

IF 6.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Tanmoy Kundu , Mark Goh , Tsan-Ming Choi
{"title":"Home delivery vs. out-of-home delivery: Syncretic value-based strategies for urban last-mile e-commerce logistics","authors":"Tanmoy Kundu ,&nbsp;Mark Goh ,&nbsp;Tsan-Ming Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adopting the Out-Of-Home Delivery (OOHD) model of using parcel lockers and convenience stores to act as pick-up and drop-off points offers many benefits over the conventional Home Delivery (HD) model in e-commerce logistics. Despite these benefits, consumers still prefer HD over OOHD for their last-mile e-commerce deliveries. While the convenience of HD is a core feature of online shopping, a question arises: Can OOHD offer better customer utility and reduce the delivery costs of last-mile logistics? Motivated by observed industrial practices, this study adopts a game-theoretic approach to analyze the strategies concerning a customer’s preference for delivery (HD vs. OOHD) and the switching (from HD to OOHD) behavior in response to an e-commerce firm’s self-pickup discount. A distinctive feature of this work is the conceptualization of an e-commerce firm’s orientation towards the triple bottom line goal of meeting consumer expectations (people), financial gains (profit), and reducing environmental impact (planet), collectively termed as the <em>syncretic value</em> in this paper. Setting the syncretic value as the business objective function, we obtain the equilibrium solutions on the discount (for OOHD) and shipping charge (for HD) that would entice a switch to OOHD. Unlike the current practice of some e-commerce delivery markets offering a flat rebate for self-pickup, our results reveal that the e-commerce firm should peg the self-pickup discount based on the online product’s price and levy a shipping charge for low-price products to encourage self-pickup. Online retailers should focus on low-price products for the OOHD-based incentivization scheme for better profitability. We provide a comparative analysis between the HD-only and hybrid (HD with OOHD) delivery models to guide the e-commerce platform operators in positioning their business models and customer engagements. The results suggest that including the syncretic value in the business objectives not only increases consumer utility (more delivery choices) and profitability of the e-commerce firm (lower delivery costs) but also addresses the environmental impact of urban logistics, thus contributing to the sustainable development goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 104309"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424003574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adopting the Out-Of-Home Delivery (OOHD) model of using parcel lockers and convenience stores to act as pick-up and drop-off points offers many benefits over the conventional Home Delivery (HD) model in e-commerce logistics. Despite these benefits, consumers still prefer HD over OOHD for their last-mile e-commerce deliveries. While the convenience of HD is a core feature of online shopping, a question arises: Can OOHD offer better customer utility and reduce the delivery costs of last-mile logistics? Motivated by observed industrial practices, this study adopts a game-theoretic approach to analyze the strategies concerning a customer’s preference for delivery (HD vs. OOHD) and the switching (from HD to OOHD) behavior in response to an e-commerce firm’s self-pickup discount. A distinctive feature of this work is the conceptualization of an e-commerce firm’s orientation towards the triple bottom line goal of meeting consumer expectations (people), financial gains (profit), and reducing environmental impact (planet), collectively termed as the syncretic value in this paper. Setting the syncretic value as the business objective function, we obtain the equilibrium solutions on the discount (for OOHD) and shipping charge (for HD) that would entice a switch to OOHD. Unlike the current practice of some e-commerce delivery markets offering a flat rebate for self-pickup, our results reveal that the e-commerce firm should peg the self-pickup discount based on the online product’s price and levy a shipping charge for low-price products to encourage self-pickup. Online retailers should focus on low-price products for the OOHD-based incentivization scheme for better profitability. We provide a comparative analysis between the HD-only and hybrid (HD with OOHD) delivery models to guide the e-commerce platform operators in positioning their business models and customer engagements. The results suggest that including the syncretic value in the business objectives not only increases consumer utility (more delivery choices) and profitability of the e-commerce firm (lower delivery costs) but also addresses the environmental impact of urban logistics, thus contributing to the sustainable development goals.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信