Tillage and residue management modulate the links between soil physical signatures and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal biomarkers

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Stamatios Thomopoulos , Lars Juhl Munkholm , Lars Elsgaard , Sabine Ravnskov
{"title":"Tillage and residue management modulate the links between soil physical signatures and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal biomarkers","authors":"Stamatios Thomopoulos ,&nbsp;Lars Juhl Munkholm ,&nbsp;Lars Elsgaard ,&nbsp;Sabine Ravnskov","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conservation practices such as direct sowing and residue incorporation are crucial for enhancing soil health. This study investigated the long-term effects of different tillage practices and crop residue management on soil biological and physical health indices to elucidate their interconnections. The impact of tillage intensity (direct sowing, harrowing, moldboard ploughing) was assessed in combination with residue management (retention or removal) across two soil depths (0–10 and 10–20 cm) and two experimental sites. Measurements included three soil biological indicators—two fatty-acid biomarkers of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and easily extractable glomalin-related soil protein (EE) − as well as two soil physical indices (water-stable aggregates (WSA), and clay dispersibility), five soil pore characteristics (air permeability, gas diffusivity, tortuosity, total porosity, air-filled porosity, and volumetric water content) and soil organic carbon (SOC). Conservation agriculture practices increased the presence of AMF, while the importance of considering soil depth in AMF biomass measurements was underscored. Harrowing and direct sowing treatments resulted in a vertical stratification of SOC. Residue retention increased SOC levels by 5 % and 15 % at the two sites and only significantly at the latter. Minimal soil disturbance enhanced wet aggregate stability by 14 % on average but negatively affected pore characteristics. AMF played a critical role in soil aggregate stability, evidenced by a strong correlation (r = 0.68 and r = 0.86 in the two sites) between hyphal networks and WSA. The study also demonstrated that direct sowing strengthened the relationship between EE and AMF (r = 0.52 and r = 0.64 for the two sites). In minimally disturbed soils, AMF contributed to a complex pore structure, with this effect being more closely related to EE than to the hyphal network. These findings underscore the significant role of AMF in maintaining soil health under various tillage practices and residue management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"454 ","pages":"Article 117204"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125000424","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conservation practices such as direct sowing and residue incorporation are crucial for enhancing soil health. This study investigated the long-term effects of different tillage practices and crop residue management on soil biological and physical health indices to elucidate their interconnections. The impact of tillage intensity (direct sowing, harrowing, moldboard ploughing) was assessed in combination with residue management (retention or removal) across two soil depths (0–10 and 10–20 cm) and two experimental sites. Measurements included three soil biological indicators—two fatty-acid biomarkers of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and easily extractable glomalin-related soil protein (EE) − as well as two soil physical indices (water-stable aggregates (WSA), and clay dispersibility), five soil pore characteristics (air permeability, gas diffusivity, tortuosity, total porosity, air-filled porosity, and volumetric water content) and soil organic carbon (SOC). Conservation agriculture practices increased the presence of AMF, while the importance of considering soil depth in AMF biomass measurements was underscored. Harrowing and direct sowing treatments resulted in a vertical stratification of SOC. Residue retention increased SOC levels by 5 % and 15 % at the two sites and only significantly at the latter. Minimal soil disturbance enhanced wet aggregate stability by 14 % on average but negatively affected pore characteristics. AMF played a critical role in soil aggregate stability, evidenced by a strong correlation (r = 0.68 and r = 0.86 in the two sites) between hyphal networks and WSA. The study also demonstrated that direct sowing strengthened the relationship between EE and AMF (r = 0.52 and r = 0.64 for the two sites). In minimally disturbed soils, AMF contributed to a complex pore structure, with this effect being more closely related to EE than to the hyphal network. These findings underscore the significant role of AMF in maintaining soil health under various tillage practices and residue management strategies.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信