Clinical significance of histological inflammation in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

IF 2.4 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Shuko Hirota , Yasuhiko Yamano , Reoto Takei , Jun Fukihara , Hajime Sasano , Toshiaki Matsuda , Kensuke Kataoka , Tomoki Kimura , Hisao Sano , Junya Fukuoka , Takeshi Johko , Yasuhiro Kondoh
{"title":"Clinical significance of histological inflammation in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease","authors":"Shuko Hirota ,&nbsp;Yasuhiko Yamano ,&nbsp;Reoto Takei ,&nbsp;Jun Fukihara ,&nbsp;Hajime Sasano ,&nbsp;Toshiaki Matsuda ,&nbsp;Kensuke Kataoka ,&nbsp;Tomoki Kimura ,&nbsp;Hisao Sano ,&nbsp;Junya Fukuoka ,&nbsp;Takeshi Johko ,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Kondoh","doi":"10.1016/j.resinv.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is known to have a poor prognosis and the relationships between histological findings and response to anti-inflammatory therapy or prognosis have not been well investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We examined SSc-ILD patients who underwent surgical lung biopsy at a single respiratory center between 2008 and 2021 and received anti-inflammatory therapy (corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive drugs). These patients were classified into two groups: an inflammation group, where histological evidence of inflammation defined as “lymphoid aggregates with germinal centers” or “plasmacytosis” was observed, and a non-inflammation group, where these findings were not observed. The correlation of the histological conclusions of inflammation with treatment response and prognosis was retrospectively investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-seven patients were included in the study; 15 (55.6%) were allocated to the inflammation group and 12 (44.4%) to the non-inflammation group. Patient backgrounds did not differ between the groups. The first annual increase in % predicted FVC was significantly larger in the inflammation group than in the non-inflammation one (from 74.3% to 85.9% vs. 75.0%–74.7%, respectively; p = 0.021). The inflammation group took significantly longer to reach end-stage lung disease, defined as an FVC &lt;50%, needing continuous oxygen, or death (p = 0.011). They also had a trend towards longer overall survival compared to the non-inflammation group (median survival: not reached vs. 6.6 years, p = 0.083).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Approximately half of the SSc-ILD patients showed histological evidence of inflammation, which may influence treatment response and long-term disease progression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20934,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory investigation","volume":"63 2","pages":"Pages 233-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212534525000024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is known to have a poor prognosis and the relationships between histological findings and response to anti-inflammatory therapy or prognosis have not been well investigated.

Methods

We examined SSc-ILD patients who underwent surgical lung biopsy at a single respiratory center between 2008 and 2021 and received anti-inflammatory therapy (corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive drugs). These patients were classified into two groups: an inflammation group, where histological evidence of inflammation defined as “lymphoid aggregates with germinal centers” or “plasmacytosis” was observed, and a non-inflammation group, where these findings were not observed. The correlation of the histological conclusions of inflammation with treatment response and prognosis was retrospectively investigated.

Results

Twenty-seven patients were included in the study; 15 (55.6%) were allocated to the inflammation group and 12 (44.4%) to the non-inflammation group. Patient backgrounds did not differ between the groups. The first annual increase in % predicted FVC was significantly larger in the inflammation group than in the non-inflammation one (from 74.3% to 85.9% vs. 75.0%–74.7%, respectively; p = 0.021). The inflammation group took significantly longer to reach end-stage lung disease, defined as an FVC <50%, needing continuous oxygen, or death (p = 0.011). They also had a trend towards longer overall survival compared to the non-inflammation group (median survival: not reached vs. 6.6 years, p = 0.083).

Conclusions

Approximately half of the SSc-ILD patients showed histological evidence of inflammation, which may influence treatment response and long-term disease progression.
系统性硬化症相关性间质性肺病组织学炎症的临床意义
背景:系统性硬化症相关间质性肺疾病(SSc-ILD)预后较差,组织学表现与抗炎治疗反应或预后之间的关系尚未得到很好的研究。方法:我们研究了2008年至2021年间在单一呼吸中心接受外科肺活检并接受抗炎治疗(皮质类固醇和/或免疫抑制药物)的SSc-ILD患者。这些患者被分为两组:炎症组,炎症的组织学证据被定义为“带有生发中心的淋巴细胞聚集”或“浆细胞增多症”,而非炎症组,这些发现未被观察到。回顾性研究炎症的组织学结论与治疗反应和预后的相关性。结果共纳入27例患者;炎症组15例(55.6%),非炎症组12例(44.4%)。两组患者的背景没有差异。炎症组预测FVC %的首年增幅明显大于非炎症组(分别为74.3% ~ 85.9%和75.0% ~ 74.7%);p = 0.021)。炎症组达到终末期肺病(定义为肺活量≥50%,需要持续供氧或死亡)所需时间明显更长(p = 0.011)。与非炎症组相比,他们的总生存期也有更长趋势(中位生存期:未达到vs. 6.6年,p = 0.083)。结论大约一半的SSc-ILD患者表现出组织学炎症证据,这可能影响治疗反应和长期疾病进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory investigation
Respiratory investigation RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信