Mapping physiology: A systems biology approach for the development of alternative methods in toxicology.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Bernard Staumont, Luiz Ladeira, Alessio Gamba, Harm J Heusinkveld, Aldert Piersma, Ellen Fritsche, Rosalinde Masereeuw, Tamara Vanhaecke, Marc Teunis, Thomas H Luechtefeld, Thomas Hartung, Ramiro Jover, Mathieu Vinken, Liesbet Geris
{"title":"Mapping physiology: A systems biology approach for the development of alternative methods in toxicology.","authors":"Bernard Staumont, Luiz Ladeira, Alessio Gamba, Harm J Heusinkveld, Aldert Piersma, Ellen Fritsche, Rosalinde Masereeuw, Tamara Vanhaecke, Marc Teunis, Thomas H Luechtefeld, Thomas Hartung, Ramiro Jover, Mathieu Vinken, Liesbet Geris","doi":"10.14573/altex.2412241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chemical safety assessment still heavily relies on animal testing, presenting ethical dilemmas and limited human predictive value. New approach methodologies (NAMs), including in vitro and in silico techniques, offer alternative solutions. In silico toxicology has made progress in predicting chemical effects but frequently lacks biological mechanistic foundations. Recent developments focus on mechanistic understanding of adverse effects inflicted by chemicals, as embedded in (quantitative) adverse outcome pathways (AOPs). However, there is a demand for more detailed mechanistic insights at the gene and cell levels, encompassing both pathology and physiology. Drawing inspiration from the Disease Maps Project, this paper introduces Physiological Maps (PMs) as comprehensive graphical representations of biochemical processes related to specific organ functions. PMs are standardized using Systems Biology Graphical Notation and controlled vocabularies and annotations. Curation guidelines have been developed to ensure reproducibility and usability. This paper presents the methodology used to build PMs, emphasizing the essential collaboration between domain experts and curators. PMs offer user-friendly, standardized visualization for data analysis and educational purposes. Enabling a better understanding of (patho)physiology, they also complement and support the development of AOPs by providing detailed mechanistic information at the gene and cell level. Furthermore, PMs contribute to developing in vitro test batteries and to building (dynamic) in silico models aiming to predict the toxicity of chemicals. Collaborative efforts between the toxicology and systems biology communities are crucial for creating standardized and comprehensive PMs, supporting and accelerating the development of human-relevant NAMs for next-generation risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2412241","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemical safety assessment still heavily relies on animal testing, presenting ethical dilemmas and limited human predictive value. New approach methodologies (NAMs), including in vitro and in silico techniques, offer alternative solutions. In silico toxicology has made progress in predicting chemical effects but frequently lacks biological mechanistic foundations. Recent developments focus on mechanistic understanding of adverse effects inflicted by chemicals, as embedded in (quantitative) adverse outcome pathways (AOPs). However, there is a demand for more detailed mechanistic insights at the gene and cell levels, encompassing both pathology and physiology. Drawing inspiration from the Disease Maps Project, this paper introduces Physiological Maps (PMs) as comprehensive graphical representations of biochemical processes related to specific organ functions. PMs are standardized using Systems Biology Graphical Notation and controlled vocabularies and annotations. Curation guidelines have been developed to ensure reproducibility and usability. This paper presents the methodology used to build PMs, emphasizing the essential collaboration between domain experts and curators. PMs offer user-friendly, standardized visualization for data analysis and educational purposes. Enabling a better understanding of (patho)physiology, they also complement and support the development of AOPs by providing detailed mechanistic information at the gene and cell level. Furthermore, PMs contribute to developing in vitro test batteries and to building (dynamic) in silico models aiming to predict the toxicity of chemicals. Collaborative efforts between the toxicology and systems biology communities are crucial for creating standardized and comprehensive PMs, supporting and accelerating the development of human-relevant NAMs for next-generation risk assessment.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ALTEX publishes original articles, short communications, reviews, as well as news and comments and meeting reports. Manuscripts submitted to ALTEX are evaluated by two expert reviewers. The evaluation takes into account the scientific merit of a manuscript and its contribution to animal welfare and the 3R principle.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信